Reducing Agents and their relative strengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter kc262
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on ranking reducing agents based on their standard reduction potentials. The user incorrectly ranked fluoride (F-) as the fourth strongest reducing agent and metallic potassium (K) as the least effective. The correct approach involves writing the reducing half-reactions first and then consulting the standard reduction potential table to accurately determine the rankings. The standard reduction potential table is crucial for understanding the relative strengths of reducing agents.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of standard reduction potentials
  • Ability to write half-reactions for redox processes
  • Familiarity with oxidation and reduction concepts
  • Basic knowledge of electrochemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the standard reduction potential table in detail
  • Practice writing and balancing half-reactions for various redox reactions
  • Learn about the factors affecting the strength of reducing agents
  • Explore the concept of electrode potentials in electrochemistry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone studying electrochemistry or redox reactions will benefit from this discussion.

kc262
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question should be quite simple. Yet I am getting it wrong. It it's really frustrating. Can someone see what I'm doing wrong? Or maybe it's because my concepts are messed up.

Assuming standard conditions, and considering the table of standard reduction potentials for half-reactions, given in your text, rank the following species according to their relative strength as reducing agents. For example, the most powerful reducing agent would be given rank "1", and the least "6".

Homework Equations


A link for a Standard reduction potential table is here: http://www.jesuitnola.org/upload/clark/refs/red_pot.htm

The Attempt at a Solution


The order I got was 4,3,2,5,1,6 ( F-, Fe2+, I-, Cd, Zn, K)
Reasoning is that the reducing agent is oxidized and therefore loses the electrons. So looking at the standard reduction potential table, I got my voltage values from there, and changed the signs where I needed to. But i keep getting it wrong. Help and a push in the right direction would be fantastic. =]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
kc262 said:
...the most powerful reducing agent would be given rank "1", and the least "6".

...The order I got was 4,3,2,5,1,6 ( F-, Fe2+, I-, Cd, Zn, K)

You have fluoride as the fourth strongest reducing agent. It's pretty difficult to remove that electron! (ie. it's a TERRIBLE reducing agent).

You have metallic potassium as the LEAST reducing! That couldn't be more wrong. (unless lithium were also on the list)

You need to start by writing for yourself the reducing half reactions. Only then are you to use the tables...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K