Reducing one algebraic fraction to another

  • Thread starter Thread starter brotherbobby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Fraction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around reducing a set of algebraic fractions to another set, as presented in a high school-level problem. Participants are exploring various methods to achieve this reduction, including the use of an auxiliary variable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to reduce the fractions by equating them to an auxiliary variable, k, and substituting values to simplify the expressions. Some participants question whether there is a method to directly reduce the fractions without introducing k. Another participant suggests a variable exchange approach to reformulate the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and observations. While some have provided insights into alternative methods, there is no explicit consensus on a single approach. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the necessity of using the auxiliary variable.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem and the authors' expectations for a specific method of reduction. The original poster highlights the difficulty in understanding the authors' solution, indicating a potential gap in clarity regarding the problem's requirements.

brotherbobby
Messages
766
Reaction score
171
Homework Statement
If $$\frac{x}{l(mb+nc-la)}= \frac{y}{m(nc+la-mb)}=\frac{z}{n(la+mb-nc)},$$
prove that $$\boxed{\frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)}= \frac{m}{y(cz+ax-by)}=\frac{n}{z(ax+by-cz)}}$$
Relevant Equations
A theorem on algebraic fractions :
(1) If ##\frac{a}{b}= \frac{c}{d}\Rightarrow \frac{ax}{bx}=\frac{cy}{dy}##
(2) If ##\frac{a}{b}=\frac{c}{b}=\frac{e}{f}=\ldots##, each of the fractions is equal to ##\pmb{\left(\frac{pa^n+qc^n+re^n+\dots}{pb^n+qd^n+rf^n+\ldots}\right)^{\frac{1}{n}}}##, where variables ##p, q, r,\ldots, n\in \mathbb{R}##
Problem statement : Let me copy and paste the problem as it appears in the text :
1638702732501.png


Attempt : I am afraid this looks like a very difficult problem, despite being at the elementary level (high school). My glance through the text shows that the authors have gone about reducing the first set of fractions to the second directly, without making the (traditional) use of the auxilliary variable ##k## to which the whole of the first list is first equated to and then simplified. Let me go with this method.

Let the given list of fractions ##\frac{x}{l(mb+nc-la)}= \frac{y}{m(nc+la-mb)}=\frac{z}{n(la+mb-nc)}=\boldsymbol{k}\;\text{(say)}##.

This would yield ##x = kl(mb+nc-la),\, y = km(nc+la-mb)\,\text{and}\, z = kn(la+mb-nc)##.

Let me the take first term in what I have to prove (given above), viz. ##\frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)}##.

Sunstituting for ##x, y, z## from above in terms of ##k, l, m, n, a, b, c##, we get :
$$\text{L.H.S (Term 1)} = \frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)} = \frac{l}{\underbrace{kl(mb+nc-la)}_{x}\left[ b\underbrace{km(nc+la-mb)}_{y}+c\underbrace{kn(la+mb-nc)}_{z}-a\underbrace{kl(mb+nc-la)}_{x} \right]},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(mb+nc-la)\left[mnbc+\bcancel{lmab}-m^2b^2+\cancel{lnac}+mnbc-n^2c^2-\bcancel{lmab}-\cancel{lnac}+la^2 \right]},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(mb+nc-la)(2mnbc+l^2a^2-m^2b^2-n^2c^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(\cancel{2m^2nb^2c}+l^2ma^2b-m^3b^3-\bcancel{mn^2bc^2}+\bcancel{2mn^2bc^2}+l^2na^2c-\cancel{m^2nb^2c}-n^3c^3-2lmnabc-l^3a^3+lm^2ab^2+ln^2ac^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(m^2nb^2c+l^2ma^2b-m^3b^3+mn^2bc^2+l^2n^2c-n^3c^3-2lmnabc-l^3a^3+lm^2ab^2+ln^2ac^2)}$$
and, upon rearranging, the first rational term on the L.H.S. reduces to :
$$\small{\text{L.H.S (Term 1)} = \frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)}=\frac{1}{k^2(l^2ma^2b+lm^2ab^2+l^2na^2c+ln^2ac^2+m^2nb^2c+mn^2bc^2-l^3a^3-m^3b^3-n^3c^3-2lmnabc)}}$$... (1)

Let me take the second term of what I have to prove (given above), viz. ##\frac{m}{y(cz+ax-by)}##, substitute for ##x,y,z## like before and see if the final expression matches the same final expression of that above.

$$\text{L.H.S (Term 2)}= \frac{m}{y(cz+ax-by)}=\frac{1}{k^2(nc+la-mb)\left[ cn(la+mb-nc)+al(mb+nc-la)-bm(nc+la-mb)\right]},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(nc+la-mb)(lnac+\cancel{mnbc}-n^2c^2+\bcancel{lmab}+lnac-l^2a^2-\cancel{mnbc}-\bcancel{lmab}+m^2b^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(nc+la-mb)(2lnac-l^2a^2+m^2b^2-n^2c^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(\cancel{2ln^2ac^2}-\bcancel{l^2na^2c}+m^2nb^2c-n^3c^3+\bcancel{2l^2na^2c}-l^3a^3+lm^2ab^2-\cancel{ln^2ac^2}-2lmnabc+l^2ma^2b-m^3b^3+mn^2bc^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(l^2ma^2b+lm^2ab^2+m^2nb^2c+mn^2bc^2+l^2na^2c+ln^2ac^2-l^3a^3-m^3b^3-n^3c^3-2lmnabc)},$$

which is the same found above (1) when the first term was reduced.

The third fraction, viz. ##\frac{n}{z(ax+by-cz)}## also reduces to the same expression as (1) above, as I have checked.

Doubt : So I did the problem. However, as you have noticed, I have made use of the auxilliary variable ##k## above, which I equated all the fractions to. Does anyone know a way by which the fractions given can be directly reduced to those required? (That is the method asked for by the authors before the problem).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not solved it yet but observed that we get another by exchange of variables;
l and x, m and y, n and z in one. And so let
xa=X,yb=Y,zc=Z,la=L,mb=M,nc=N the problem is written as
If
\frac{X}{L(M+N-L)}=\frac{Y}{M(N+L-M)}=\frac{Z}{N(L+M-N)}=1
then prove
\frac{L}{X(Y+Z-X)}=\frac{M}{Y(Z+X-Y)}=\frac{N}{Z(X+Y-Z)}

We can make the first equation equals to 1 without losing generality. By expressing X,Y,Z by M,N,L using the first equation
X+Y-Z=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)
Y+Z-X=(L+N-M)(L+M-N)
Z+X-Y=(M+L-N)(M+N-L)
and
\frac{(Y+Z-X)X}{L}=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)(L+M-N)
\frac{(Z+X-Y)Y}{M}=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)(L+M-N)
\frac{(X+Y-Z)Z}{N}=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)(L+M-N)
We get the expected result.
 
Last edited:
Your response (@anuttarasammyak) is similar to what I did in post #1, except that I equated all the fractions given to an arbitrary ##k##.

I post the solution below as given by the authors. It is incredibly well done and, needless to say, very difficult. I struggled at several places to understand what the authors were doing, let alone try and do it myself !

1638882095682.png
 
It seems to say 1/2 = 2/4 = (1+2)/(2+4). Smart but I think it is mere a technique .
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K