Insights Reduction of Order For Recursions

  • Thread starter Thread starter topsquark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of recursion relations, illustrating how they generate sequences like {1, 4, 7, 10} and the Fibonacci series. It highlights the formulation of these sequences using rules, such as a_{n + 1} = a_n + 3 for the first example and F_{n + 2} = F_{n + 1} + F_{n} for Fibonacci numbers. There is a debate over terminology, with participants discussing the use of "recursion relation" versus "recurrence relation" and the preference for "finite difference calculus" over "difference calculus." Some participants express difficulty finding resources on finite difference calculus, indicating a gap in available information. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the foundational understanding of recursion and its terminology in mathematical contexts.
topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
This is not meant as a full introduction to recursion relations but it should suffice for just about any level of the student.
Most of us remember recursion relations from secondary school. We start with a number, say, 1. Then we add 3. That gives us 4. Now we that number and add 3 again and get 7. And so on. This process creates a series of numbers ##\{ 1, 4, 7, 10, \dots \}##. Once we get beyond that stage we start talking about how to represent these. Well, let’s call the starting number ##a_0##. Then the next number in the series would be ##a_1##, then ##a_2##, …, on to ##a_n## where n is the nth number in the series. We may now express our recursion as a rule: ##a_{n +1} = a_n + 3##, where ##a_0 = 1##.
We may go much further. We can talk about things like the Fibonacci series: ##F_{n + 2} = F_{n + 1} + F_{n}##, where ##F_1 = F_2 = 1##. This is the famous series ##\{ 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, \dots \}##. But what if we want a formula to find out what ##F_n## is for the nth number...

Continue reading...
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn, pbuk, fresh_42 and 1 other person
Mathematics news on Phys.org
topsquark said:
Is the term "recursion relation" in common use? I would call it a "recurrence relation".

Also I would say "finite difference calculus" instead of "difference calculus".
 
pbuk said:
Is the term "recursion relation" in common use? I would call it a "recurrence relation".

Also I would say "finite difference calculus" instead of "difference calculus".
Sorry! As I understand it both terms (the recursive and finite difference) are in use. However, the only work I've done with recurrence relations comes from High School and I couldn't really find much on the web about finite difference calculus. I had to fill in a lot of gaps to do this, so I may not be using standard terminology.

-Dan
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top