Reflection and Transmission Matrix for a 2x2 Hamiltonian in a Conducting Channel

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sokrates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elementary Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on constructing a 2x2 reflection and transmission matrix for a Hamiltonian representing a conducting channel, specifically the Rashba Hamiltonian defined as H_{Rashba}=\sigma_y k_x - \sigma_x k_y. The user seeks methods and terminology relevant to this problem, emphasizing the need for a clear approach rather than a direct solution. The inquiry highlights the importance of understanding wavefunction interactions in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of spin components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wavefunctions and Hamiltonians.
  • Familiarity with the Rashba effect and its implications in spintronics.
  • Knowledge of matrix operations in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of reflection and transmission coefficients in quantum scattering.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of reflection and transmission matrices for 2x2 Hamiltonians.
  • Study the implications of the Rashba effect in quantum systems.
  • Explore the use of scattering theory in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about spinor wavefunctions and their applications in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in spintronics, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics who are interested in wavefunction behavior in conducting channels.

sokrates
Messages
481
Reaction score
2
Suppose I have a 2x2 Hamiltonian describing a conducting channel, as a black box.

[tex]H_{Rashba}=\sigma_y k_x - \sigma_x k_y[/tex]

and also suppose I have an incident 2x1 wavefunction with up and down spin components, to this black box.

What I am trying to do is to write a 2x2 reflection (or transmission) matrix for the wavefunction that is incident to this region.

How can I do this? How do you go about doing such a problem? What are the methods or appropriate terminology for this kind of problem?

I hope the question is clear... Thanks in advance for any guidance.

(This is not homework) ( and I don't want the solution, just the method)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are so many epistemologists in this forum, nowadays, that nobody can answer even the simplest physics problems.

Good luck figuring which interpretation is better,

I found my answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K