Reheating and the horizon problem - chicken and egg?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GeorgeDishman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Egg Horizon Inflation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between reheating, inflation, and the horizon problem in cosmology. Participants explore how these concepts interconnect and the implications for the uniformity of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that inflation solves the horizon problem by expanding a region in thermal equilibrium to a size larger than the observable universe, leading to uniform CMB temperature.
  • Another participant argues that global equilibrium before inflation is unnecessary, as inflation can erase initial conditions, leaving a homogeneous inflaton field throughout the universe.
  • A participant interprets that the homogeneous density of the inflaton field during decay contributes to the observed horizon temperature, seeking clarification on this point.
  • One participant emphasizes that reheating did not cause the CMB, suggesting a distinction between these processes.
  • A participant introduces a metaphorical quote to illustrate the transformation of hydrogen into more complex structures over time, hinting at the complexity of the processes involved.
  • Another participant references lectures by Alan Guth, indicating that there was time for thermal processes to establish equilibrium in small patches before inflation expanded them beyond the current horizon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of pre-inflation equilibrium and the role of reheating in relation to the CMB. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the timeline and dependencies of these processes.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion related to assumptions about initial conditions, the definitions of equilibrium, and the specific mechanisms of reheating and inflation. These factors remain unresolved.

GeorgeDishman
Messages
419
Reaction score
29
One of the benefits of inflation often mentioned in beginner treatments is that it solves the horizon problem by taking a volume which was in thermal equilibrium and expanding it so much that it is now larger than the observable universe thus explaining how the CMB temperature is so uniform.

Reheating says the majority of the particle contents of the universe were created as the potential oscillated around the minimum (the "true vacuum" value) at the end of inflation.

This combination of descriptions appears to create a "chicken and egg" paradox, the matter was produced at the end of inflation by reheating but needed to have reached equilibrium before inflation in order to be solve the horizon problem.

What is the correct timeline and dependency for these processes?
 
Space news on Phys.org
There is no need to reach global equilibrium before inflation. Inflation blows up the tiniest region to immense size and washes out any initial state. All that is left after is the inflaton field that will be the same everywhere in the observable universe.

The point is that inflation creates a homogeneous initial condition for the remaining history of the universe.
 
So are you saying that because the inflaton field when it started to decay had a homogeneous density when its energy was converted to matter through reheating, that resulted in the homogeneous observed horizon temperature? That makes sense to me, thanks.
 
As long as you keep in mind that reheating didn't cause the CMB ;)
 
Well there might be a few interesting steps in between but I relate that to Edward Harrison's quote "Hydrogen is a light, odorless gas, which, given enough time, turns into people." :wink:
 
A waste of perfectly good hydrogen gas, in some cases.
 
This is a few years old now but I just came across lectures by Alan Guth in which he discusses this and answers my questions. He says there was sufficient time for the normal processes of thermal to act to produce equilibrium within a small patch before inflation then expanded to greater than our current horizon. The relevant section is here and lasts about a minute:

 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K