Reheating and the horizon problem - chicken and egg?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GeorgeDishman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Egg Horizon Inflation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between inflation, reheating, and the horizon problem in cosmology. It establishes that inflation expands a small region of the universe to a size larger than the observable universe, creating a homogeneous initial condition. Reheating occurs at the end of inflation, producing matter from the inflaton field's decay, which contributes to the uniform temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). The timeline reveals that global equilibrium is not necessary before inflation, as the inflaton field's properties ensure homogeneity post-inflation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic inflation and its mechanisms
  • Familiarity with the concept of reheating in cosmology
  • Knowledge of the horizon problem in the context of the universe's expansion
  • Basic grasp of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and its significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of cosmic inflation and its implications on the universe's structure
  • Explore the process of reheating and its role in particle creation post-inflation
  • Study the horizon problem in detail, focusing on its resolution through inflation
  • Examine lectures and writings by Alan Guth on inflationary theory and reheating
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the fundamental processes of the universe's evolution and the interplay between inflation and reheating.

GeorgeDishman
Messages
419
Reaction score
29
One of the benefits of inflation often mentioned in beginner treatments is that it solves the horizon problem by taking a volume which was in thermal equilibrium and expanding it so much that it is now larger than the observable universe thus explaining how the CMB temperature is so uniform.

Reheating says the majority of the particle contents of the universe were created as the potential oscillated around the minimum (the "true vacuum" value) at the end of inflation.

This combination of descriptions appears to create a "chicken and egg" paradox, the matter was produced at the end of inflation by reheating but needed to have reached equilibrium before inflation in order to be solve the horizon problem.

What is the correct timeline and dependency for these processes?
 
Space news on Phys.org
There is no need to reach global equilibrium before inflation. Inflation blows up the tiniest region to immense size and washes out any initial state. All that is left after is the inflaton field that will be the same everywhere in the observable universe.

The point is that inflation creates a homogeneous initial condition for the remaining history of the universe.
 
So are you saying that because the inflaton field when it started to decay had a homogeneous density when its energy was converted to matter through reheating, that resulted in the homogeneous observed horizon temperature? That makes sense to me, thanks.
 
As long as you keep in mind that reheating didn't cause the CMB ;)
 
Well there might be a few interesting steps in between but I relate that to Edward Harrison's quote "Hydrogen is a light, odorless gas, which, given enough time, turns into people." :wink:
 
A waste of perfectly good hydrogen gas, in some cases.
 
This is a few years old now but I just came across lectures by Alan Guth in which he discusses this and answers my questions. He says there was sufficient time for the normal processes of thermal to act to produce equilibrium within a small patch before inflation then expanded to greater than our current horizon. The relevant section is here and lasts about a minute:

 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K