Relative distances (motion problem) --

  • Thread starter Thread starter christian0710
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a collision where an automobile decelerates from 50 km/h at a rate of 200 m/s². The passenger, not wearing a seatbelt, crashes into the dashboard, with a distance of 0.60 m between them initially. The calculations reveal that the passenger's speed upon impact is 8.64 m/s, while the car's speed at that moment is 6.9 m/s, resulting in a relative speed of 1.74 m/s. The key insight is that the problem focuses on relative velocity rather than relative distance, emphasizing the importance of understanding the timing of the collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations for motion
  • Knowledge of units conversion (km/h to m/s)
  • Familiarity with concepts of deceleration and relative velocity
  • Basic principles of collision dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations in detail, focusing on deceleration scenarios
  • Learn about relative velocity and its applications in collision analysis
  • Explore the effects of seatbelt use on passenger safety during collisions
  • Investigate real-world collision data to understand the dynamics of vehicle impacts
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, automotive safety engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions and the effects of deceleration on passenger safety.

christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


In a collision, an automobile initially traveling at 50 km/h decelerates at a constant rate of 200 m/s^2. A passenger not wearing a seat belt crashes against the dashboard. Before the collision, the distance between the passenger and the dashboard was 0.60 m. With what speed, relative to the automobile, does the passenger crash into the dashboard? Assume that the passenger has no deceleration before contact with the dashboard.

Homework Equations

+ [/B]
The equations for the cars decceleration, velocity and distance traveled are:

a=-a=200m/s^2
v=--a*t +V0
X(t) = -a/2 * t^2 +V0*t 3.The attempt at a solution
we change velocity into m/s
50km/h = 50*1000/60^2 = (125/9 ) m/s

The time at which the car comes to a halt is when velocity = zero
0= a*t –V0
t=V0/a = (125/9)/200 = 5/72sec

The distance the car traveled in that time is
X(5/72) = -200/2 * (125/9)^2 +(125/9)*(5/72) = 0.48 meters

The speed of the passenger must be
0,06m/5/72sec = 8.64m/s

The speed of the car must be
0.48/(5/27) = 6.9m/s

The difference between 8.64 and 6.9 ( I assume is what is meant by relative distance? ) can impossible be 15.6 m/s which is the answer.

Help Is a ppreciated.



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution hinges on calculating details about when the passenger's face "overtakes" his car, because until that happens there is no damage incurred to his head. The time the car takes to come to a standstill has no real relevance, the damage has been done long before the car halts, usually.

The question is asking for relative velocity, not relative distance.
 
The problem doesn't state that the car remains at a halt when its speed reaches zero. If you find that the car reaches zero speed before the passenger hits the dashboard then I suppose you'll have to make an assumption about any continuing motion of the car after that instant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K