Relativistic Bohmian trajectories of photons via weak measurements

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper "Relativistic Bohmian trajectories of photons via weak measurements" by Joshua Foo et al., which presents a novel approach to constructing relativistic Bohmian trajectories using weak measurements of momentum and energy. This method allows for the measurement of Bohmian trajectories even if the Bohmian interpretation is incorrect. The authors apply their formalism to derive the relativistic spacetime trajectories of photons in a Michelson–Sagnac interferometer, adhering to quantum-mechanical continuity and the relativistic velocity addition rule. Additionally, they propose a modified Alcubierre metric to explain these trajectories within general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bohmian mechanics and its implications in quantum theory.
  • Familiarity with weak measurement techniques in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of special relativity and its principles.
  • Basic concepts of interferometry, specifically the Michelson–Sagnac setup.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of weak measurements in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the Alcubierre metric and its applications in theoretical physics.
  • Study the principles of relativistic velocity addition in detail.
  • Investigate the historical context and developments in Bohmian mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the intersection of quantum theory and relativity, particularly those exploring the implications of Bohmian mechanics and weak measurement techniques.

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,378
I found out about this interesting paper through a Tweet by Steven Thomson.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05169
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31608-6
Relativistic Bohmian trajectories of photons via weak measurements
Joshua Foo, Estelle Asmodelle, Austin P. Lund, Timothy C. Ralph
Bohmian mechanics is a nonlocal hidden-variable interpretation of quantum theory which predicts that particles follow deterministic trajectories in spacetime. Historically, the study of Bohmian trajectories has mainly been restricted to nonrelativistic regimes due to the widely held belief that the theory is incompatible with special relativity. Here, we present an approach for constructing the relativistic Bohmian-type velocity field of single particles. The advantage of our proposal is that it is operational in nature, grounded in weak measurements of the particle’s momentum and energy. We apply our weak measurement formalism to obtain the relativistic spacetime trajectories of photons in a Michelson–Sagnac interferometer. The trajectories satisfy quantum-mechanical continuity and the relativistic velocity addition rule. We propose a modified Alcubierre metric which could give rise to these trajectories within the paradigm of general relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Killtech, gentzen and Demystifier
Physics news on Phys.org
Weak measurement makes Bohmian trajectories measurable even if Bohmian interpretation is wrong. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Demystifier said:
Weak measurement makes Bohmian trajectories measurable even if Bohmian interpretation is wrong. :smile:
What do you mean by "if"?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
martinbn said:
What do you mean by "if"?
I mean "though some people may think that". :-p
 
Demystifier said:
I mean "though some people may think that". :-p
What I meant was that you misspelled "if". In your first post it should be spelled "though".
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: ojitojuntos and atyy
martinbn said:
What I meant was that you misspelled "if". In your first post it should be spelled "though".
That's a difference between American and British spelling.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen
Demystifier said:
That's a difference between American and British spelling.
It's not a spelling difference.

"Weak measurement makes Bohmian trajectories measurable even if the Bohmian interpretation is wrong." means BM may be wrong.

"Weak measurement makes Bohmian trajectories measurable even though the Bohmian interpretation is wrong." means BM is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattt and martinbn
atyy said:
It's not a spelling difference.

"Weak measurement makes Bohmian trajectories measurable even if the Bohmian interpretation is wrong." means BM may be wrong.

"Weak measurement makes Bohmian trajectories measurable even though the Bohmian interpretation is wrong." means BM is wrong.
Yes, that was the idea of the joke, but it didn't work.
 
martinbn said:
Yes, that was the idea of the joke, but it didn't work.
It worked, but my counter-joke didn't. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and gentzen
  • #10
atyy said:
It's not a spelling difference.
I thought it was obvious that I was kidding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ojitojuntos and atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
23K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K