I Relativistic length contraction

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of relativistic length contraction on the burning of wooden rods and the operation of pendulum clocks in a moving rocket. An observer watching the rocket at relativistic speeds will not see the rod oriented along the rocket burn faster than the one oriented across it, despite length contraction. The burning time of the rod depends on the direction of the fire's propagation and the relativity of simultaneity, complicating the scenario. Additionally, the clocks oscillating in different orientations will not show a difference in time for the observer, contradicting initial assumptions about their behavior under relativistic conditions. Overall, the intricacies of relativity reveal that perceived rates of burning and clock oscillation are not straightforwardly affected by length contraction.
leonid.ge
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
Hello!
I have a question.
If there is a wooden rod which burns certain time, and an astronaut inside rocket lights two such rods: one oriented along the rocket's length and the other goes across the rocket, and an observer see the rocket passing by with a relativistic speed. Will the observer see that the rod which goes along the rocket burns faster because it's length contracted?

And if we have in the rocket two clocks which use spring pendulum, and one clock is oriented so its spring oscillates along the rocket and in the other clock it oscillates across the rocket - will the first clock go slower than the second (for the observer watching the rocket passing by with relativistic speed)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No and no.

The first case is a bit trickier though as it cannot be solved without taking additional care about relativity of simultaneity. The rod oriented along the rocket will burn in different times depending on whether it burns front to back or back to front.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and topsquark
leonid.ge said:
Will the observer see that the rod which goes along the rocket burns faster because it's length contracted?
No. Example burning back to front:
The rest-frame of the observer shall be the unprimed frame ##S##.
The rest-frame of the rocket the primed frame ##S'##.

##\Delta x'##:= rest-length of the rod, which goes along the rocket.
##\Delta t'##:= time of the burning with reference to the rocket's rest-frame.
##u'##:= velocity of the fire with reference to the rocket's rest-frame.
##u##:= velocity of the fire with reference to the observer's rest-frame.
##v##:= velocity of the rocket with reference to the observer's rest-frame.

Time of the burning (back to front) with reference to the observer's rest-frame, considering length-contraction:
##\Delta t = \frac{\Delta x'}{\gamma (u-v)} = \frac{\Delta x'}{\gamma}\frac{1}{\frac{u'+v}{1+u'v/c^2}-v} = \frac{\Delta x'}{\gamma} \frac{1+u'v/c^2}{u'(1-v^2/c^2)} = \gamma \frac{\Delta x'}{u'} (1+\frac{u'v}{c^2}) = \gamma(\Delta t' + \Delta x' \frac{v}{c^2})##
This is the inverse Lorentz-transformation for time.
 
Last edited:
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 166 ·
6
Replies
166
Views
14K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K