I Relativistic length contraction

leonid.ge
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
Hello!
I have a question.
If there is a wooden rod which burns certain time, and an astronaut inside rocket lights two such rods: one oriented along the rocket's length and the other goes across the rocket, and an observer see the rocket passing by with a relativistic speed. Will the observer see that the rod which goes along the rocket burns faster because it's length contracted?

And if we have in the rocket two clocks which use spring pendulum, and one clock is oriented so its spring oscillates along the rocket and in the other clock it oscillates across the rocket - will the first clock go slower than the second (for the observer watching the rocket passing by with relativistic speed)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No and no.

The first case is a bit trickier though as it cannot be solved without taking additional care about relativity of simultaneity. The rod oriented along the rocket will burn in different times depending on whether it burns front to back or back to front.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and topsquark
leonid.ge said:
Will the observer see that the rod which goes along the rocket burns faster because it's length contracted?
No. Example burning back to front:
The rest-frame of the observer shall be the unprimed frame ##S##.
The rest-frame of the rocket the primed frame ##S'##.

##\Delta x'##:= rest-length of the rod, which goes along the rocket.
##\Delta t'##:= time of the burning with reference to the rocket's rest-frame.
##u'##:= velocity of the fire with reference to the rocket's rest-frame.
##u##:= velocity of the fire with reference to the observer's rest-frame.
##v##:= velocity of the rocket with reference to the observer's rest-frame.

Time of the burning (back to front) with reference to the observer's rest-frame, considering length-contraction:
##\Delta t = \frac{\Delta x'}{\gamma (u-v)} = \frac{\Delta x'}{\gamma}\frac{1}{\frac{u'+v}{1+u'v/c^2}-v} = \frac{\Delta x'}{\gamma} \frac{1+u'v/c^2}{u'(1-v^2/c^2)} = \gamma \frac{\Delta x'}{u'} (1+\frac{u'v}{c^2}) = \gamma(\Delta t' + \Delta x' \frac{v}{c^2})##
This is the inverse Lorentz-transformation for time.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
3K
Replies
78
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
166
Views
14K
Back
Top