Undergrad Relativity Considerations for Measurements on a Free Particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 743765
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Position
Click For Summary
An initially localized free particle, when measured for momentum, becomes a plane wave, leading to a probability of finding it far from its original position during a subsequent measurement. This raises questions about potential violations of relativity if the particle is found outside its expected future light cone. Standard quantum mechanics (QM) is non-relativistic and incompatible with special relativity (SR), as evidenced by the non-covariant nature of the Schrödinger equation. To address these issues, a relativistic framework such as the Dirac equation or quantum field theory is necessary. Standard QM serves only as a non-relativistic approximation, highlighting the need for more advanced models in particle physics.
member 743765
Suppose I have an initially localized free particle at x0 then I measure its momentum it will become a plane wave so there is a probability that if I measure its position again to find it far away from its initial position if the time between the two measurements were T isn't finding the particle at xo+2cT for example violate relativity ....because of that I imagine that an initially localized particle must be modeled to be a particle in infinite box with width equals 2ct but I was told that this isnt a true model but why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Standard QM is non relativistic and is not compatible with SR. You can see this directly from the Schrodinger equation, which is not covariant, as the derivatives with respect to time and spatial coordinates are different.

And, indeed, it's possible to find a particle outside its future light cone. To patch this up, you need a relativistic theory, such as the Dirac equation. Or, fully fledged relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Of which standard QM is a non-relativistic approximation.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes phinds and PeterDonis
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K