I Relativity Considerations for Measurements on a Free Particle

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 743765
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Position
member 743765
Suppose I have an initially localized free particle at x0 then I measure its momentum it will become a plane wave so there is a probability that if I measure its position again to find it far away from its initial position if the time between the two measurements were T isn't finding the particle at xo+2cT for example violate relativity ....because of that I imagine that an initially localized particle must be modeled to be a particle in infinite box with width equals 2ct but I was told that this isnt a true model but why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Standard QM is non relativistic and is not compatible with SR. You can see this directly from the Schrodinger equation, which is not covariant, as the derivatives with respect to time and spatial coordinates are different.

And, indeed, it's possible to find a particle outside its future light cone. To patch this up, you need a relativistic theory, such as the Dirac equation. Or, fully fledged relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Of which standard QM is a non-relativistic approximation.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes phinds and PeterDonis
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top