Remembering David Jones: Nature's Daedalus Columnist

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

David Jones, the renowned writer of the Daedalus column in Nature, has passed away due to prostate cancer. He was known for creating fake perpetual motion machines to challenge scientific understanding, including a notable clock designed in collaboration with John Joseph Merlin. His work sparked discussions on the principles of thermodynamics, particularly the impossibility of perpetual motion. The forum highlights various resources, including articles and books, that delve into his contributions and legacy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics, specifically the first and second laws.
  • Familiarity with the concept of perpetual motion machines.
  • Knowledge of historical scientific figures and their contributions.
  • Basic research skills to locate academic articles and books.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of thermodynamics in detail.
  • Research the history and impact of perpetual motion machines.
  • Read the Daedalus column archives in Nature for insights into Jones's work.
  • Investigate the DREADCO company and its contributions to engineering challenges.
USEFUL FOR

Anyone interested in the intersection of science and engineering, historians of science, and readers of Nature looking to understand the legacy of David Jones and his contributions to scientific discourse.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
11,966
David Jones, who wrote the Daedalus column in Nature has died of Prostrate cancer.
Here is a very interesting NY Times article on him.

I read his column when I was in labs that got Nature.
The times article had a lot of info on him that I was unaware of.
Very interesting guy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Craftek_Ana, NascentOxygen, 256bits and 1 other person
Biology news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Craftek_Ana, NascentOxygen and BillTre


Does anyone want to have a go at it?

My initial thought was powered by atmospheric pressure.

Cox's timepiece is a clock developed in the 1760s by James Cox. It was developed in collaboration with John Joseph Merlin (with whom Cox also worked on developing automata). Cox claimed that his design was a true perpetual motion machine, but as the device is powered from changes in atmospheric pressure via a mercury barometer, this is not the case. The clock still exists today but was deactivated at the time of the clock's relocation to the Victoria and Albert Museum in London.[1]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
I can no longer edit the above post.

Of course perpetual motion machine are impossible ,as it would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

It is is a fake perpetual machine, one of four Mr. Jones built throughout his life.

He was quite the interesting fellow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, jedishrfu and BillTre
BillTre said:
. . . died of Prostrate cancer.
Damn, another cancer worry. . . you just lay there until you're dead, I guess ? . :oldtongue:

.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
While we don’t discuss perpetual motion machines at PF, we are allowing this thread to mention them in deference to David Jones and his many interesting topics in the New Scientist magazine as the writer of the Daedalus column.

David Jones began intentionally creating fake perpetual motion machines in order to challenge scientists and others to discover their source of power. In the @Craftek_Ana post, a David Jones creation was shown as part of an exhibit and the presenter explains its operation without giving away its secret.

His DREADCO company, stood for Daedalus Research Engineering And Development Company

More on Prof Jones

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_E._H._Jones
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Craftek_Ana

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
801