Rent control and market intervention - pros and cons

  • Thread starter Thread starter dj023102
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Rent control serves as a significant market intervention, particularly during inflationary periods when tenants outnumber landlords. The short-run implications include increased search activity, the emergence of a black market, deadweight loss, and a shortage of rental accommodations. While rent control lowers costs for some tenants, it simultaneously raises prices for others, benefiting only those who secure lower rents. Long-term effects include deteriorating building conditions as landlords are unable to charge higher rents for maintenance and improvements, ultimately exacerbating the housing supply issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of economic principles such as supply and demand
  • Familiarity with market intervention concepts
  • Knowledge of the implications of price controls
  • Basic grasp of housing market dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "rent control theory" for comprehensive insights
  • Examine case studies on the long-term effects of rent control in various cities
  • Explore alternatives to rent control for addressing housing shortages
  • Investigate the relationship between housing supply and rental prices
USEFUL FOR

Economists, policymakers, real estate professionals, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of rent control on housing markets.

dj023102
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Rent control are often used as a popular market intervention, particularly in periods of inflation and where tenants outnumber owners. What are the short-run and long-run implications of introducing such controls?
Any help would be appreicated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This sounds like homework. What do you think the answers are?
 
Well i thought the short run implications would be that search activity would occur and a black market arises. A dead weight loss would also occur and generally it would result in shortage of rent accomdation. also though they do lower the rent for some they raise the rent for others. The only winners of rent control are the people who are able to get the lower rents. i am not sure how to explain the long run of rent control.

Am i going in the right direction with this?
 
What do you think would happen to the condition of the buildings over time?
 
over time the building conditions would deterioate i am guessing and landlords would force tenants to pay a high price to fix and re condition the buildings.
 
Well rent control means they can't force the tenants to pay a higher price...

I think you are going in the right direction. Googling "rent control theory" gets a lot of hits to good articles. Some are subscription only, but you may be able to get them through your library. There is a lot of info out there.
 
Last edited:
IMO, rent control is a bad idea. If housing prices are high then there is a shortage of housing. If prices are artificially kept low then there will be no increase in supply. In other words, the real problem is the short supply (the high price is just a symptom) and rent control ensures that the problem never gets solved.

Price gouging is generally a good thing.
 
Apartment rent is ridiculous. Where I live, you can pay $1100/month for a tiny 1000 sqft apartment, or you can pay $500/month for a $200,000 house with around 2,000 sqft. I know the utilities of apartments have to be cheaper than for a big house. Why the hell are apartments more expensive then? They should be a hell of a lot cheaper. Something simply doesn't add up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
748
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K