Repeated measurements and granular space time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of granular spacetime for deriving conservation laws in physics. Participants argue that existing theories, which assume continuous spacetime, lack the necessary models to derive these laws in a granular framework. Asymptotic boundary conservation laws, applicable in quantum gravity, are acknowledged, but the complexity of quasi-local conservation laws is highlighted due to the challenges in specifying subregions. The conversation also touches on the nature of entanglement and its potential independence from spatial and temporal constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum gravity principles
  • Familiarity with conservation laws in physics
  • Knowledge of asymptotic boundary conditions
  • Basic concepts of entanglement in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research models of granular spacetime in theoretical physics
  • Explore asymptotic boundary conservation laws in quantum gravity
  • Investigate quasi-local conservation laws and their implications
  • Study the role of entanglement in non-local processes
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and students interested in the foundational aspects of conservation laws and spacetime theories.

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pfs,
I would like to know if it would be possible for our known theories to derive
conservation laws if space time was really granular.
I think that entanglement is the only process which would succeed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Our known theories assume continuous spacetime. To derive something in granular spacetime we need models that have it built in. And we don't, at least not developed to the point where we can derive conservation laws.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and phinds
There was already a thread about this question not too long ago: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/conservation-of-energy-in-quantum-gravity.1061153/

"Conservation laws" can mean many different things in gravity. The most conservative and well-understood of these, asymptotic boundary conservation laws, would apply just as well in quantum gravity, when you have asymptotic boundaries. Asymptotic boundaries are typically fixed boundary conditions in the gravitational path integral.

If you are asking about quasi-local conservation laws then the situation is more complicated as it is not clear how to specify subregions in quantum gravity. But it would be surprising if some form of conservation laws didn't hold. If you have no asymptotic boundaries and you aren't fixing some bulk subregion in the gravity path integral (which again is poorly understood) then you just have the pure gravitational constraints.
 
Would it be possible that severall conservation laws could be explained by the fact
that we have processes vhich do not depend on space or time?
Entanglement seems to be not local.
Take the the Foucault's pendulum. It oscillates in a plane that does not depend on
the rotarion of the earth, the position of the sun or other stars. It only depends on
the initial choice , not on far objects.
 
Heidi said:
Would it be possible

Everything is possible and nothing is possible if we don't have any concrete model at hand.

Heidi said:
Take the the Foucault's pendulum. It oscillates in a plane that does not depend on
the rotarion of the earth

In Earths frame of reference it surely does depend on its rotation.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
860
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
626