Finding Average Molarity: SF in Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozonecom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data
Click For Summary
To find the average molarity of two solutions, 0.092 M and 0.095 M, the calculation begins with their sum, yielding 0.187 M, which is reported with three decimal places due to the addition rule. However, when determining the significant figures for the final average, the result must reflect the least number of significant figures from the original data, which is two. Therefore, the average molarity should be reported as 0.094 M, despite the intermediate calculation suggesting 0.0935 M. The discussion also touches on uncertainty, suggesting a preference for 0.094 M if explicit uncertainty cannot be provided. Ultimately, the correct reporting aligns with significant figure rules and the precision of the initial measurements.
frozonecom
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Significant Figures in Data

Suppose I have two recorded Molarity of a certain solution.
And the data I have are:

0.092 M and 0.095 M --- which both has 2 significant figures.

If I were asked to get the AVERAGE MOLARITY of my substance, then I'd do:

(0.092 M + 0.095 M)/2 = My AVG. MOLARITY.

Since 2 is an exact number, I will not base the SF of my final answer to that number.
Instead, I'd base it to my Molarities, but I know I should do the addition first, since they're enclosed in a parenthesis. (following PEMDAS)

0.092 M + 0.095 M = 0.187 M ----- (It should have 3 decimal places, since that is my least decimal place in my data)

Then, dividing my answer by 2, should I report it as:

0.0935 M ----- since 0.187 has 3 SF
OR
0.094 M ------- since my initial working data only has 2 SF?

Which one is more correct? Which one should I follow and why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone??
 
I would quote (0.0935 +- 0.0004) M, where the 4 comes from the assumption that both initial values have an uncertainty of 0.0005 each and the remaining part is error propagation.
If you cannot give an explicit uncertainty for some reason, I think I would prefer 0.094 M.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
930
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K