Undergrad Representations of a delta function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the various representations of the delta function and the need for references that provide proofs suitable for physicists. While mathematical texts are recommended for rigorous proofs, many physics references offer demonstrations rather than formal proofs. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the properties of the delta function, particularly its integral over all space equaling one. Techniques for manipulating delta functions involve pairing them with test functions and using limits to establish identities. Overall, resources like Strichartz's book are suggested for accessible insights into distribution theory relevant to physicists.
Frabjous
Gold Member
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
2,396
There are many representations of the delta function. Is there a place/reference that lists AND proves them? I am interested in proofs that would satisfy a physicist not a mathematician.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By representations, do you mean the generating functions that produce the delta in the limit? Physics references do not generally provide proofs so much as demonstrations or explanations, so if you want a proof you should stick to math texts. The list of texts containing demonstrations/discussions, on the other hand, is nearly limitless. Open up your favorite one. Here are a few examples
  • Arfken, Mathematical Methods for Physicists
  • Bracewell, The Fourier Transform and Its Applications
  • Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (of course!)
 
  • Like
Likes S.G. Janssens
caz said:
representations of the delta function. Is there a place/reference that lists AND proves them
I wonder what you would consider a proof of a representation . A delta function is a something with certain well described properties. The word distributions comes to mind (out of the dust of ages). Showing that the representation exhibits such properties is just that: a showing.

[Links added after commenting; plenty references for further study. As a physicist I'm comfortable with 'infinitely narrow and high needle with area 1' :cool: but I would never claim that would prove anything]
 
I am actually comfortable with the delta function. It’s just that I am many years past grad school and was reading something (Intermediate Quantum Mechanics by Bethe) that piqued my interest in how to to show that these representations have the correct properties.
 
caz said:
I am actually comfortable with the delta function. It’s just that I am many years past grad school and was reading something (Intermediate Quantum Mechanics by Bethe) that piqued my interest in how to to show that these representations have the correct properties.
What are the properties you refer to?
 
That the integral over all space of the representations equals one. I am interested in how to do the integrals. Some of them I can solve, some of them I cannot. I do not want to look them up in an integral table.
 
The best way (avoiding magic) to manipulate ##\delta##-functions or, generally, distributions, is by first pairing with an arbitrary (i.e. smooth, compactly supported) test function, doing the manipulations (usually involving partial integration) and limits in ##\mathbb{R}## and then, at the end, concluding that a certain identity, or limit representation holds true for the distributions in question, because the test function was chosen arbitrarily.

Any introduction to (or: containing material about) distribution theory will show you this in detail, while keeping the underlying functional analysis out, or to a minimum, so it is accessible to physicists with a good background in multivariable calculus. There is the book by Strichartz and the book by Duistermaat and Kolk, for example.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and hutchphd
I’ll give Strichartz a try. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K