Representations of Symmetry Operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the representation of symmetry operators for spin 1/2 particles and their generalization to a four-component spinor basis localized on two sites, |a, up>, |a, down>, |b, up>, |b, down>. The time reversal operator is represented as T = iσyK, while the three-fold rotation symmetry is expressed as C3 = exp(i(π/3)σz). The consensus is that while the basis is expanded to a 4x4 matrix, the symmetry operators primarily act on the spin states, and the use of tensor products is not necessary for a single particle system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spin 1/2 particle representations
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices (σy, σz)
  • Knowledge of symmetry operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of tensor products in quantum states
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of tensor products in multi-particle quantum systems
  • Study the effects of antilinear operators on quantum states
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of symmetry operators in higher-dimensional spinor spaces
  • Learn about the representation of rotation operators in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students studying quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on symmetry operations in quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

stone
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
For spin 1/2 particles, I know how to write the representations of the symmetry operators
for instance T=i\sigma^{y}K (time reversal operator)
C_{3}=exp(i(\pi/3)\sigma^{z}) (three fold rotation symmetry) etc.

My question is how do we generalize this to, let's say, a basis of four component spinor with spins localized on two sites a and b
(|a, up>, |a, down>, |b, up>, |b, down>)^{T}

Is it a direct product i\sigma^{y}K \otimes i\sigma^{y}K
Or i\sigma^{y}K \otimes I_{2 \times 2}

Or is it something else?
It would be wonderful if you could point to any references.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stone, No generalization is necessary. Using tensor products would be appropriate if you were talking about a system with several particles, but my understanding is that you have just one.

The Pauli matrices you've written, σy and so forth, act on the particle's spin coordinate. They do not affect |a> and |b>. Furthermore the antilinear operator K may be defined so as to also leave the basis states |a> and |b> unchanged, and therefore its only effect will be to complex conjugate the coefficients. That is, if you have a state |ψ> = α|a> + β|b>, then K|ψ> = α*|a> + β*|b>.
 
Thanks for the reply.
Yes the number of particles is still one, but the basis is now 4x4 instead of the usual 2x2, then we need to represent the symmetry operators in terms of 4x4 matrices.
I am still not sure how to go about doing this.
 
Some more help would be appreciated.
 
Ok, I yield! If you want to represent your four states as a tensor product of two 2-spaces, S ⊗ T say, then an operator R that acts only on the spin part will be of the form R ⊗ I.

I have a couple of reasons for resisting this, one is (IMHO) it's a rather cumbersome way of stating a simple fact, namely that the rotation operator acts on just the spin states. For a more general example, in which instead of |a> and |b> you had states |l m> say, which were also affected by rotations, you'd have to write the action as (S ⊗ I) ⊕ (I ⊗ L).
 
thanks for yielding!
I understand now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K