Request for a clarification about the Ward identity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Ward identity as presented in Peskin & Schroeder's quantum field theory. The three-point function is analyzed, specifically the expression for the Fourier transform of the function ##G^\mu (x_1,x_2,x_3)##. The relationship between the Ward identity and the Ward-Takahashi identity derived from the path integral formulation is questioned, particularly in how the perturbative terms in Green's functions relate to the photon field and current at the same position. The reference to Chapter 6.6 of the provided lecture notes is crucial for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly the Ward identity.
  • Familiarity with three-point functions and their Fourier transforms.
  • Knowledge of 1PI (one-particle irreducible) graphs and their significance in quantum field theory.
  • Experience with path integral formulation and its application in deriving identities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Ward-Takahashi identity from the path integral approach.
  • Examine the role of contact terms in quantum field theory calculations.
  • Review the implications of photon and fermion propagators in three-point functions.
  • Analyze the relationship between current operators and field operators in quantum field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum field theorists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics will benefit from this discussion.

HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
TL;DR
Request for clarification on the Ward identity
Hi I've been reading Peskin & Schroeder lately and I have some confusions over the ward identity.

So I think I understand how the identity works at a practical level but not exactly where it comes from. To illustrate my questions (which are difficult to state generally), I will make use the example of the three point function ##G^\mu (x_1,x_2,x_3)=\langle \Omega |T{ A^\mu (x_1)\psi (x_2) \bar \psi (x_3)}|\Omega\rangle##. The Fourier transform of this function looks like

$$\tilde{G}^\mu(p_1,p_2,p_3) = (2\pi)^4 \delta^4 (p_1 - p_2 + p_3) D^{\mu\nu}(p_2-p_3)\tilde{S}(p_2)i\Gamma_{\nu} (p_2,p_3)\tilde{S}(p_3), $$ where ##\Gamma## are the 1PI graphs, ##D## and ##S## are the photon and fermion propagators respectively. The Ward identity says if we throw out the photon progator and the constant factors before it, and then contract the remaining part with the photon momentum ##q = p_2 - p_3##, we'll get

$$q_\mu \tilde{S}(p_2)i\Gamma^\mu(p_2,p_3)\tilde{S}(p_3) \sim e(\tilde{S}(p_2) - \tilde{S}(p_3)).$$

Okay this is all good but I don't understand how this relates to the version of the Ward-Takahashi identity obtained from the path integral. Specifically, how can the above be dervied from the relation $$i\partial_\mu \langle 0 |T{ j^\mu (x)\psi (x_2) \bar \psi (x_3)}|0\rangle = \mathsf{Contact\ terms}$$ when the perturbative terms in the greens functions take the form $$ \langle 0 |T{A^\nu(x_1)\psi (x_2) \bar \psi (x_3)}[\int d^4x A^\mu (x) j_\mu (x)]^n|0\rangle.$$ I can't see how you can relate the two together since in the latter case there is a photon field at the same position as the current.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K