Unclear formulation of Ward identity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter IRobot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Ward identity
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
IRobot
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am really familiar with the Ward-Takashi identity formulated in the form [itex]k_{\mu}M^{\mu\nu}=0[/itex] applying the fact that the longitudinal polarization of the 4 vector A is nonphysical (redundant) and should not contribute to the physical amplitudes. But, by opening a test subject on QED, I ran into this formula: [itex]-\frac{1}{\alpha}\Box\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu} + \partial^{\mu}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta A^{\mu}} + ie\psi\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\psi} -ie\bar{\psi}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\bar{\psi}}=0[/itex] which is quite unclear for me. [itex]\Gamma [\psi,\bar{\psi},A][/itex] is the generator of 1PI graphs. Does someone have a reference on the derivation of that, or could show me how to get this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Section 12.1, eq. 12.13 in Kaku "Quantum Field Theory - A modern introduction" (1993)
 
Thanks, I checked in Kaku's book, and indeed it's not hard to derive, by playing with [itex]Z[\eta,\bar{\eta},J^{\mu}][/itex] and [itex]\Gamma[\psi,\bar{\psi},A^{\mu}][/itex].