Request For a Set of Eyes on an Oscillating Steel Cantilever

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling a vibrating cantilever beam, specifically for the Wurlitzer 200 Electric Piano, using principles from Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory and spring-mass systems. The user, Jesse, presents calculations for beam dimensions, material properties, and oscillation equations, aiming to determine vertical displacement over time. Key issues identified include the incorrect application of boundary conditions leading to zero displacement at the free end, which contradicts the expected behavior of a cantilever. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using appropriate mode shapes for accurate modeling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory
  • Familiarity with spring-mass systems
  • Knowledge of mechanical properties of materials, specifically steel
  • Basic proficiency in Python for modeling and plotting oscillations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the correct boundary conditions for cantilever beams in vibration analysis
  • Learn about Rayleigh's method for mode shape analysis in cantilever beams
  • Explore advanced damping models and their effects on oscillation decay
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving differential equations related to beam vibrations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for electrical engineering students, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in modeling vibrating structures, particularly in the context of musical instruments and mechanical systems.

Jesse Millwood
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am an electrical engineering student and I was hoping some body here could help me out with a cantilever question.

I want to model a vibrating cantilever with a mass at the end. I am doing this for a project where I wanted to model a Wurlitzer 200 Electric Piano. The way they produce the oscillations is kind of neat where there is a steel reed that is grounded and when it is struck by the key mechanism it vibrates. There is then a pickup that is kind of like a comb, where the teeth of it go in between all of the reeds corresponding with different keys. The comb pickup is pulled up to around 150V by a 1Meg resistor, since there is a difference in voltage across a distance, there is capacitance and with the vibrating reed, it makes a variable capacitor. I am fine with the capacitance calculations and modeling the rest of the circuitry but I am getting kind of bogged down with some of these (relatively basic?) calculations with the beam vibrating.

My idea to model the vibrating reed as a cantilever with a point mass on the end is to treat it as a spring mass system. I (quickly) read through some texts on the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory but opted to model it as a spring because in Harris' Shock and Vibration Handbook there didn't seem to be that big of a difference between the Rayleigh method and others when compared in chapter 7. If I have time at the end I will go back and get more complicated but for now I would like to just model the beam in a simple manner. I haven't had a mechanical class that dealt with cantilevers in a while and I looked at some old notes but we never covered vibrating structures, as it was a statics class. So I was thinking that I could model the cantilever as a spring mass system.

What I have so far for an example calculation is something like this:
^ y
| ///|________
| ///|________|* <-Point mass
| ///|
|-----------------------> x
Dimensions of the beam (this is for one of the F# reeds):
Length : ##36.83 mm##
Thickness : ##0.64 mm##
Width : ##3.83 mm##

Steel Properties:
Density (##\rho##) : ##8050 g/m3##
Youngs' Modulus (##Y##) : ##210e9 GPa##
2nd Moment of Inertia (##I##) : ##\frac{width \cdot thickness^3}{12} = 83.67e-15##
Spring Constant (##k##) : ## \frac{3\cdot Y \cdot I}{L^3} = 1055##
Damping Ratio (##\zeta##) : ##\frac{\pi}{L} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{k\cdot \rho}} = 29.27e-3##

Cantilever (reed) Properties:
Initial Displacement (##\delta_0##): ##2mm##
mass at the end(##m##): ##1.33g##

I want to be able to calculate the vertical displacement at a particular x value along the beam at a particular time value. I am doing it this way:
##y(x,t) = \delta_0 \cdot e^{\frac{-\zeta}{m\cdot t}}\cdot sin\left(\pi \frac{x}{l} \right) sin\left( \omega t\right)##
where ##\omega =\sqrt{\frac{k}{m+0.23m}}##

I have pieced together equations from various texts that I can find for free and other websites so my main question here is :
Does anyone see any glaring inconsistencies or anything that is very wrong here?

My reason for asking for a second set of mechanically inclined eyes is when I model it this way, the oscillation does not seem to die out as I would expect. I don't know why I expect it to die out sooner but I just have a feeling that something may be miscalculated.

As it stands my simple python script plots this oscillation at 174Hz (which is what I want) but the oscillations seem to die out around 4 minutes (the plot is attached). Also When I change my ##x## value to be half of the length the oscillation at the shorter distance down the beam has a higher amplitude, I feel that it is from the ##sin\left(\pi \frac{x}{l}\right)## term in my ##y(x,t)## equation and now I can not find the source of that equation.

Thank you for any help, guidance or a friendly point in the right direction/material,
Jesse
 

Attachments

  • figure_1.png
    figure_1.png
    27.8 KB · Views: 509
Engineering news on Phys.org
Jesse, the sin(pi*x/L) factor that you have in your solution will give the solution an identically zero value at x = L. This is not what you want for a cantilever; the free end should show maximum displacement.

If this came out of a Rayleigh solution assumed mode shape, you were presumably looking at a pinned-pinned (or simply supported) beam, not a cantilever.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
24K
Replies
3
Views
1K