Resonance/energy levels contributing structures

  • Thread starter Thread starter DDTea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levels Structures
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of resonance and energy levels in organic chemistry, specifically referencing "The Art of Writing Reasonable Organic Reaction Mechanisms" by Robert B. Grossman. The participant expresses confusion regarding the definition of "higher energy" in relation to resonance structures of a carbon-carbon double bond (C=C). It is clarified that while some resonance structures may be theoretically possible, they do not accurately describe the behavior of the double bond. The participant concludes that resonance is not limited to structures of equal energy, and emphasizes the importance of understanding the energy calculations involved, which can be explored through methods such as molecular orbital (MO) theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of resonance structures in organic chemistry
  • Familiarity with molecular orbital (MO) theory
  • Knowledge of valence bond theory
  • Basic principles of quantum chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of resonance in "quantum chemistry" by Eyring, Walter, and Kimball
  • Explore molecular orbital methods for energy calculations
  • Review Linus Pauling's works on resonance structures
  • Investigate the relationship between resonance and molecular Hamiltonians
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of resonance and energy levels in molecular structures.

DDTea
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I'm working my way through The Art of Writing Reasonable Organic Reaction Mechanisms by Robert B. Grossman (excellent book, by the way), but the way he describes resonance is confusing me. I feel like the more I think about it, the more confusing it gets.

Consider a carbon-carbon double bond: C=C. He says that there are a few different ways that the pi electrons can be distributed in this bond:

C=C
(-)C--C(+)
(+)C--C(-)
.C--C.

Where the last structure is a radical. Although some of those structures are theoretically possible, they would offer a poor description of the behavior of the C=C . So, he develops a set of rules for which theoretical contributing structures are higher in energy and thus poorer descriptions of the chemical behavior.

So my question is, is this definition of "higher energy" a literal definition? Or am I misunderstanding the definition of resonance: degenerate solutions for the energy term in the Schrödinger equation--i.e., of equal energy!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If he is using an isolated double bond to describe resonance it is only being used in the form of an object lesson. ie. you might draw a double bond in the following ways...
just as you might draw resonance structures in the following ways. How the energies of the various representations are calculated, if not discussed by Grossman, can be assumed to be by one of the various MO methods that are accurate enough to provide a relative ranking.
 
The different structures correspond best to a set of valence bond structures. You can now form a matrix representaiton of your molecular hamiltonian using these structures as a basis. The diagonal matrix elements will be the "energies" of the hypothetical isolated structures. The importance of a given structure in the real wavefunction of the molecule depends not only on tihs energy but also on the value of the non-diagonal matrix elements. However it is important that resonance is not restricted to structures of the same energy.
These concepts should be exposed in the books by Linus Pauling, or, on a more theoretical basis in the classic book "quantum chemistry" by Eyring Walter and Kimball.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
517
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
488
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K