Resulting force of an object with variable movement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the resulting force of an object with variable movement, specifically focusing on the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and force. The subject area includes concepts from kinematics and dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the assumption of constant force and acceleration, with some suggesting treating acceleration as a function of time. There are attempts to derive acceleration from velocity and questions about unit conversions between km/h and m/s.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the problem's setup and the implications of unit conversions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation of velocity to find acceleration, but there remains uncertainty about the correct approach and interpretation of the question.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the units provided in the problem, particularly the use of km/h for velocity and how it relates to the calculations in SI units. Participants express uncertainty about the necessity of converting units and the implications of the given parameters.

Thietlan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The movement of a material point of mass 500 mg is described using the following formula: ## v=9 \cdot \beta \cdot t^4 ## ,variable in time and is expressed in km/h. Considering the movement in the context of classical physics, and knowing the constant ## \beta=0.2 m \cdot s^{-5} ## . The resulting force which acts on the object at t=20s is equal to:
## 0.08 kg m \cdot s^{-5} ##
## 8 kg *m \cdot s^{-2} ##
80 N
8 kN
Relevant Equations
## v=9* \beta * t^4 ##
## \beta = 0.2 m*s^{-5} ##
v(20)=288000 m/s=80000km/h
a=(80 000-0)/(20 -0)=4000 m*s^(-2)
F=m*a=0.0005*80 000 which doesn't fit any answers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

You seem to have assumed constant force and constant acceleration.
 
PeroK said:
:welcome:

You seem to have assumed constant force and constant acceleration.
Then how should I go about solving it?
 
Thietlan said:
Then how should I go about solving it?
Treat the acceleration as a function of time.
 
PeroK said:
Treat the acceleration as a function of time.
Ok I calculate acceleration as the derivative of v which comes out to be ## a=36 \cdot \beta t^3 km/h^2 ## and then simply calculate F= m*a(20) ,still doesn't give the right answer. What else am I missing?
 
Thietlan said:
Ok I calculate acceleration as the derivative of v which comes out to be ## a=36 \cdot \beta t^3 km/h^2 ## and then simply calculate F= m*a(20) ,still doesn't give the right answer. What else am I missing?
I must be honest, I don't understand the question. It gives ##\beta## in ##m/s##, time in seconds and force in SI units. So, I don't understand the reference to ##km/h##.
 
A confusingly written question. But you can match one of the answers in the list by proceeding as follows:

v is the velocity in km/h. Let V be the velocity in m/s. That means V = v/3.6 and the given equation becomes:
V(t) = 9βt⁴/3.6 = 9*0.2*t⁴/3.6 = 0.5t⁴

Differentiate V(t) to find a(t) in m/s². The rest is straightforward.

Edit: minor changes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Steve4Physics said:
A confusingly written question. But you can match one of the answers in the list by proceeding as follows:

v is the velocity in km/h. Let V be the velocity in m/s. That means V = v/3.6 and the given equation becomes:
V(t) = 9βt⁴/3.6 = 9*0.2*t⁴/3.6 = 0.5t⁴

Differentiate V(t) to find a(t) in m/s². The rest is straightforward.

Edit: minor changes
You did well to work that out. The question, IMO, is the product of a sick mind!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
PeroK said:
I must be honest, I don't understand the question. It gives ##\beta## in ##m/s##, time in seconds and force in SI units. So, I don't understand the reference to ##km/h##.
Neither did I and yes while dividing by 3.6 gives one of the responses I don't really get why I would need to divide. If it is in km/h then we should be multiplied by 3.6 and if it were in m/s well,in case there is no need to convert.
 
  • #10
Thietlan said:
Neither did I and yes while dividing by 3.6 gives one of the responses I don't really get why I would need to divide. If it is in km/h then we should be multiplied by 3.6 and if it were in m/s well,in case there is no need to convert.
For example, take v = 3.6km/h. What is this in m/s?

This speed corresponds to covering 3600m in 3600s. In m/s, this speed is V = distance/time = 3600m/3600s = 1m/s. (There are other ways to convert units, but this method should make what is happening clear.)

In terms of simple arithmetic we have divided the speed in km/h by 3.6 to get the speed in m/s.

In the given equation v(t) = 9βt⁴, we are (confusingly) told that v is in km/h. So dividing v by 3.6 converts it to m/s.

If V is the velocity in m/s: V(t) = v(t)/3.6 = 9βt⁴/3.6

And from that point on, using V(t), we are working entirely in SI units.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K