MHB Retirement Policy Comparison: A vs B

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a comparison between two retirement policies: Policy A offers $10,000 annually for ten years starting in 35 years, while Policy B provides a lump sum of $100,000 after the same period. Participants argue that receiving the lump sum is more beneficial, as it allows for investment and potential growth due to interest. Some express skepticism about the adequacy of $10,000 per year for retirement, suggesting it may not be sufficient for living expenses. The conversation also touches on the relevance of personal income sources and living conditions in different countries. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the lump sum being the more advantageous option.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
19
you have been given a choice between
two retirement polices as described below
Policy A: You will receive equa annual payments of
\$10000 beginning 35 years from now for 10 years
Policy B. You will receive one lump-sum of \$100,000 in 35 years from now.
Which policy would you choose?
Assuming rate of interest is 6 percent.
---------------------------------------
ok i didn't understand just what you do with this
since as retired you would need spend the money?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: two retirement polices

This is pretty close to trivial. Receiving 10000 dollars a year for 10 years would give you, after 10 years, 100000 dollars. Receiving 100000 dollars now you could put some of it in the bank at any interest and wind up with more than $100000.
 
Re: two retirement polices

you mean like this

\begin{align*}\displaystyle
&=90000+(90000)(06)&=5400\\
&=80000+(80000)(06)&=4800\\
&=70000+(70000)(06)&=4200\\
&=60000+(60000)(06)&=3600\\
&=50000+(50000)(06)&=3000\\
&=40000+(40000)(06)&=2400\\
&=30000+(30000)(06)&=1800\\
&=20000+(20000)(06)&=1200\\
&=10000+(10000)(06)&=0600\\
&\textbf{total interest earned}&=24000
\end{align*}
 
Re: two retirement polices

I think you missed my point. You don't need to do any arithmetic to realize that $100000 plus some amount of money is better than $100000 only.
 
Re: two retirement polices

yeah I know
just curious

no body could could retire
on 10,000 a year!
 
Re: two retirement polices

3) The fact that a person has a pension of $10000 a year does not necessarily mean that is their only source of income.

2) There are some countries in the world where a person could live, comfortably, on %10000 a day.

3) That isn't really relevant to the original question.
 
Re: two retirement polices

I'm retired
So it's relevant!

$10,000 a day?
 
Re: two retirement polices

karush said:
I'm retired
So it's relevant!

$10,000 a day?
So am I. If you want me to do the experiment, I would be willing to try living on $10,000 a day!
 
Re: two retirement polices

it would be budget nightmare
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K