Retrospective Technology Assessments

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick_starstrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Technology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around retrospective technology assessments, focusing on the analysis of historical research and development efforts that contributed to the creation of specific technologies. Participants express interest in both historical examples and contemporary assessments, particularly regarding the balance between corporate R&D and fundamental research.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions the TRACES study from the 1960s, which aimed to trace the research efforts behind technological advancements but struggles to find accessible copies.
  • Another participant shares their experience in a program during the mid-1980s that aimed to transfer knowledge from older generations of scientists and engineers, noting that much historical technology has been lost or not preserved.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of assessing the contributions of corporate R&D versus fundamental research in the development of technologies like the iPod.
  • Several links to resources and studies related to retrospective technology assessments are provided, indicating various methodologies and examples of such assessments.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the availability of retrospective assessments for specific technologies or systems, suggesting that it may be challenging to find comprehensive analyses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the availability or comprehensiveness of retrospective technology assessments, and multiple views on the importance and preservation of historical technology are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations in preserving historical technology and the varying methodologies used in retrospective assessments, which may affect the outcomes and interpretations of such studies.

maverick_starstrider
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
7
I've recently become aware of such things where they look at a new technology and try to trace back all the research (both basic and directed) that went into it and the relative amounts of each and such. Specifically I've read about one in the 1960's called TRACES (technology in retrospect and critical events in science), however, I cannot find a copy of it online or elsewhere. Anyway, I was wondering if anyone knew a link or a book that does these sorts of analysis I'd be particularly interested in ones about more recent stuff.
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
One could search on "retrospective, technology", but I'm not sure what one will find.

I participated in such a program during the mid-1980s in which which a select set of graduate students particpated in seminars, meetings or conferences with scientists and engineers who pioneered work during the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s. Those scientists were retired, and some of that generation were deceased. The objective was to transfer knowledge from one generation to the next or subsequent generation.

Unfortunately, much of that technology has not been preserved. In some cases, improvements have been made. In some cases, technology has been lost.

I've seen cases were an incredible amount of historical information and legacy technology has been trashed. But that's business.
 
Astronuc said:
One could search on "retrospective, technology", but I'm not sure what one will find.

I participated in such a program during the mid-1980s in which which a select set of graduate students particpated in seminars, meetings or conferences with scientists and engineers who pioneered work during the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s. Those scientists were retired, and some of that generation were deceased. The objective was to transfer knowledge from one generation to the next or subsequent generation.

Unfortunately, much of that technology has not been preserved. In some cases, improvements have been made. In some cases, technology has been lost.

I've seen cases were an incredible amount of historical information and legacy technology has been trashed. But that's business.

I'm afraid I don't really understand what you mean. I'm referring to studies and such done by the NSF that look at something like the "iPod" and track back the grand total of development effort, directed research effort and basic research efforts that led to the creation of such a technology. The justification being to gauge the relative importance of corporate R&D vs. fundamental research in producing the technological wonders we find around us.
 
Technology in retrospect and critical events in science, Volume 1, IITRI, 1968
http://books.google.com/books/about/Technology_in_retrospect_and_critical_ev.html?id=j5goAQAAMAAJ

Vol 2 - http://books.google.com/books/about/Technology_in_retrospect_and_critical_ev.html?id=qpgoAQAAMAAJ

Someone involved - TRACES study at IITRI (Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science. Chicago: IIT Research Institute.)
http://scimaps.org/maps/map/tracing_of_key_event_4/


Apparently there are different ways of doing assessments, as well as different types of assessments:

Forecasting the Telephone: A Retrospective Technology Assessment
http://thorngren.nu/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Sola_Pool-Ch1..pdf

Retrospective Technology Assessment
http://www.jstor.org/pss/3103592

Water and Wastes: A Retrospective Assessment of Wastewater Technology in the United States, 1800-1932
http://www.jstor.org/pss/3104713

Technology Assessment
http://www.iaia.org/iaiawiki/techassess.ashx

Technology and the Air Force: A Retrospective Assessment
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1410201856/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Planning Report 03-1
Methods for Assessing the Economic Impacts of Government R&D
http://www.nist.gov/director/planning/upload/report03-1.pdf

Assessing Research Impact
Semiquantitative Methods
http://erx.sagepub.com/content/18/1/11.abstract

Apparently, there is a TRACES III, from Diffusion of innovations By Everett M. Rogers:
http://books.google.com/books?id=v1...etrospect, critical events in science&f=false

and from Inside the black box: technology and economics By Nathan Rosenberg
http://books.google.com/books?id=GS...etrospect, critical events in science&f=false


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Technology_Assessment
Some functions incorporated into GAO.


It might be difficult to find a retrospective technology assessment on a given technology or system.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K