Review: G. Polya's 'How To Solve It' - Engineer's Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter Malenfant
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perceptions of engineers regarding G. Polya's book 'How To Solve It'. Participants share their experiences and opinions on the book's usefulness, particularly in relation to problem-solving in engineering and physics contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the book's usefulness after browsing it, seeking opinions from other engineers.
  • Another participant shares their struggle to engage with the book, finding it boring and not resonating with its conversational style.
  • A third participant agrees with the sentiment that the book may not be engaging for everyone.
  • One participant mentions purchasing the book with the hope that it would assist in their Physics degree, implying skepticism about its effectiveness.
  • A different participant, who has not read the book, questions the feasibility of writing a textbook on problem-solving, suggesting that problem-solving skills develop over years of study and collaboration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express mixed feelings about the book, with some finding it unengaging while others question its overall value. There is no consensus on its effectiveness or utility for engineers.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note personal preferences and experiences that may influence their views, such as the conversational style of the book and its relevance to specific academic pursuits.

Who May Find This Useful

Engineers, students in physics or related fields, and individuals interested in problem-solving methodologies may find the discussion relevant.

Malenfant
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What does everyone specifically engineers think of this book? I recently bought a used copy and after browsing it I really don't know if its useful or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've tried a number of times to get into it. Unfortunately, it just bores me senseless after only a few pages, and I haven't managed to get into the real wisdom it is supposed to contain. I honestly just don't like the "conversational" style of the book.

- Warren
 
^you are not the only one.
 
I bought it, hoping it would help me with my Physics degree, although its still on the summer reading "to do" pile, so from what I gather its not too great?
 
That book has appeared in a few premium bookstores - Try looking in Borders Books & Music shops.

Having never read it, I should not say this: but designing a textbook on how to solve problems seems to be too vague as a task or set of tasks for which to write a book. You learn to solve problems through at least a few years of study and subject matter design; including at times collaboration with other problem solvers and problem posers. I believe that fundamental mechanics physics forces some people to become problem solvers. We just learn to think more critically, but specifically what else is happening in our development may not be so clear...
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K