Revolutionizing Space Travel: The Innovative Design of the Circular Module

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of creating a spaceship capable of traveling throughout the solar system, particularly to Mars. The speaker suggests a circular design with engines mounted near the top, allowing for simulated gravity and easier landings. They question why the standard missile design is always used and suggest doing calculations to determine the feasibility of their design. The conversation concludes with the idea that movies often choose familiar designs for the sake of convenience and cost, rather than considering practical solutions.
  • #1
ZMacZ
21
1
basic ship model.PNG


When I see stuff on Netflix (yes not real), and yet I look stuff up on the Net (real)
and they try and create a spaceship capable of travellng anywhere else in the solar system,
they always come up with standard missile design and go "new and improved.."

When they then show failure to actually land such a vessel ( https://www.netflix.com/watch/80216899 )
around 37:00,
I always ask myself, why ?
If you want to go into outer space you need 2 things for long term space travel, at least..
Simulated gravity and landing capability of parts of the vessel after it reaches it's destination,
in the case of this series from Netflix, Mars.

I made a simple diagram, that has no problem with achieving this..
Each 'module' is circular in design, with it's engine mounted near the top rather than it's bottom..
Once in space each module can be connected to the next and the next..
Leftover fuel goes into the 'lander' module (which could be the front one.)

then when moving to Mars the design would have enough width to spin, and create
a simulated gravity, and,
when landing it would use it's main engine to reduce the speed while the center of gravity
would be located near it's bottom, with the point of force being above that,
automatically levelling out against gravity and thus being able to land..
(and even to take off again if or when needed..)

So, my question is this:
What's with the persistence on the age old rocket model ? is there a certain advantage to it,
or does every new rocketscientist always take the same design and tinker with it till it's 'new' ?
 

Attachments

  • basic ship model.PNG
    basic ship model.PNG
    7.1 KB · Views: 756
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do some calculations. Establish the size required to spin fast enough to cause usable simulated gravity without causing motion sickness, then estimate the total mass of such a space ship, then what it would take to put all of that into LEO, time and effort to assemble, rocket engine size required to lift off Mars, fuel required for the round trip, etc. Don't forget the mass of air required (in tons). Even if your numbers are not very accurate, you will answer your own question.
 
  • #3
jrmichler said:
Do some calculations. Establish the size required to spin fast enough to cause usable simulated gravity without causing motion sickness, then estimate the total mass of such a space ship, then what it would take to put all of that into LEO, time and effort to assemble, rocket engine size required to lift off Mars, fuel required for the round trip, etc. Don't forget the mass of air required (in tons). Even if your numbers are not very accurate, you will answer your own question.

The mass would be the same as a regular design missile shaped rocket..
The 'assembly' of each section would be a simple docking procedure, less than 1 hour..
The trip to Mars wasn't part of the question (it was stated IF..)
The amount of air would be same..

The size would be expandable, depending on each section's function..
Some things like sleeping and living quarters would be expanded outward (rectractable too) for the purposes of generating that simulated gravity..
Other sections would be non expanded, mostly used for storage of fuel and supplies..
But all this doesn't enter into it..

With same mass and air volume, there wouldn't be any additional fuel requirements, except for a slight increase in wind resistance
at lower altitudes..
It's a hollow structure, with only the sides of it being used as 'vessel'..
(although the construction itself would be usable as part of the habitat on Mars..)
(Following that series "Mars" on Netflix..)

But still, why the missile shaped ones ?
They are hard to stabilize on a powered landing, and need all kinds of side thrusters,
just to keep it steady, while the graph I added, clearly is superior,
since the center of gravity is below it's engine..
Any streeting thrust would only be needed in case of an actual wanted deviation,
rather then to keep it on track..

(It's about the shape of the ship, not on viability of going to Mars..)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
ZMacZ said:
I always ask myself, why ?
Because the CGI cost would skyrocket from any really complex and/or creative design: especially if a scientist is involved.
It's the same if some weightlessness is included in the movie. So it's just cheaper to make a well recognized design and declare that artificial gravity is already solved (some technobabble might be added at this point, but it is not a requirement)(also a 'valid' solution for movies to forget the whole gravity stuff).

There is no other reason. Movies are usually not about reality.
 

Related to Revolutionizing Space Travel: The Innovative Design of the Circular Module

What is the circular module and how does it revolutionize space travel?

The circular module is a new design for spacecraft that uses a circular shape instead of the traditional cylindrical shape. This design allows for more efficient use of space and resources, making it possible to travel further and for longer periods of time.

How does the circular module address the challenges of space travel?

The circular module is designed to address several challenges of space travel, such as limited space and resources, long-term sustainability, and radiation protection. Its compact and efficient design maximizes space and minimizes resource usage, while also providing better protection against radiation.

What are the benefits of using the circular module for space travel?

The circular module offers several benefits for space travel, including increased efficiency, reduced costs, improved sustainability, and better safety for astronauts. It also allows for longer missions and the possibility of exploring new frontiers in space.

How does the circular module differ from traditional spacecraft designs?

The circular module differs from traditional spacecraft designs in its shape and functionality. While traditional spacecraft are typically cylindrical and have separate compartments for different purposes, the circular module combines all necessary functions into one compact and efficient design.

What advancements in technology have made the circular module possible?

The circular module is made possible by advancements in materials, propulsion systems, and space technology. Lightweight and durable materials, as well as more powerful and efficient propulsion systems, have made it possible to design and build a spacecraft with a circular shape that can withstand the harsh conditions of space.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
24
Views
741
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
3
Replies
85
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
48
Views
12K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top