Rewriting a limit as a derivative

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NavalMonte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit can be rewritten as a derivative using the function \( f(x) = \sec x \). The limit expression \( \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{\sec(\pi + h) + 1}{h} \) is equivalent to \( \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{\sec(\pi + h) - \sec(\pi)}{h} \), which defines the derivative \( f'(\pi) \). The derivative evaluates to \( \frac{d}{dx}[\sec(x)] \) at \( x = \pi \), confirming that the limit approaches 0 as \( h \) approaches 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and derivatives in calculus
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically secant
  • Knowledge of the definition of the derivative
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and derivatives of trigonometric functions, focusing on \( \sec(x) \)
  • Learn about the limit definition of derivatives in calculus
  • Explore the application of L'Hôpital's Rule for evaluating limits
  • Investigate the behavior of secant and cosine functions near critical points
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the application of limits in derivative calculations.

NavalMonte
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I was asked to rewrite the limit as a derivative:

$$\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{sec(\pi + h) + 1}{h}$$

Any hints on how to start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What function do you think you'd be taking the derivative of, do you think?
 
Ackbach said:
What function do you think you'd be taking the derivative of, do you think?

I'm sorry but I'm not sure what you're asking.
 
Well, when you calculate a derivative, it's the derivative of a function. What's the only function in sight here?
 
Hello, NavalMonte!

It would have been considerate to give us the original problem.
I'm forced to guess what you are asking.

I was asked to rewrite the limit as a derivative:
$$\lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{\sec(\pi + h) + 1}{h}$$
I wager that the problem said:

. . \text{Given: }\:f(x) \,=\,\sec x
. . \text{Find }f'(x)\text{ at }x = \pi\text{ by definition.}\frac{f(\pi+h) - f(x)}{h} \;=\;\frac{\sec(\pi+h) - \sec(\pi)}{h}

. . . =\;\frac{\sec(\pi+h) - (-1)}{h} \;=\;\frac{\sec(\pi+h) + 1}{h}

Note that: .\sec(\pi+h) \:=\:\frac{1}{\cos(\pi+h)} \:=\:\frac{1}{-\cos h}

We have: .\frac{-\frac{1}{\cos h} +1}{h} \:=\:\frac{-1 + \cos h}{h\cos h} \:=\:-\frac{1-\cos h}{h\cos h}

Multiply by \frac{1+\cos h}{1+\cos h}\!:\;-\frac{1-\cos h}{h\cos h}\cdot\frac{1+\cos h}{1+\cos h}

. . . =\;-\frac{1-\cos^2h}{h\cos h(1+\cos h)} \;=\;-\frac{\sin^2h}{h\cos h(1+\cos h)}

. . . =\;-\frac{\sin h}{h}\cdot\frac{\sin h}{\cos h(1+\cos h)}Thus: .\lim_{h\to0}\left[-\frac{\sin h}{h}\cdot\frac{\sin h}{\cos h(1 + \cos h)} \right] \:=\:-1\cdot\frac{0}{1(2)} \:=\:0
 
What Ackbach was getting at is:

What is $\sec(\pi) = \dfrac{1}{\cos(\pi)}$?

Do you see an expression in your formula that is the negative of this?
 
Rewriting this limit into a derivative:

$$\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{sec(\pi + h) + 1}{h}$$

Looks like it came from:

$$\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{f(a + h) - f(a)}{h}$$

I have to ask:

a=?
f(a+h)=?

So,
a = $\pi$
f(a + h) = sec($\pi$ + h)

therefore,
f(a) = Sec($\pi$) = -1

Plugging it back in works out:$$\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{sec(\pi + h) - (-1)}{h} => \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{sec(\pi + h) + 1}{h}$$

So the answer would be:

$$\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{sec(\pi + h) + 1}{h} = \dfrac{d}{dx}[cos(x)]$$

Would this be correct?
I had a professor give me a hint, but I'm not to sure if this would be what the question was asking for.
 
Nope.

You had everything right until this point:

$\displaystyle \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\sec(\pi + h) + 1}{h}$

now if $\sec(\pi) = -1$, we can re-write THAT as:

$\displaystyle \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\sec(\pi + h) - \sec(\pi)}{h}$

which looks like it's the derivative of what we're calling $f$, which is...?

(Hint: it's NOT "cosine").
 
Meant to say Sec(x).

Silly mistake (Doh)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K