Riemann Curvature: Understanding Parallel Transport on 1D Rings

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Narasoma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Riemann
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of Riemann curvature in the context of one-dimensional rings within General Relativity (GR). It establishes that a one-dimensional manifold lacks intrinsic curvature, as parallel transport of a vector around such a ring results in no change in direction. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic curvature, noting that while a one-dimensional space can be embedded in higher dimensions, GR primarily concerns itself with intrinsic curvature, rendering extrinsic curvature irrelevant for one-dimensional scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with Riemann curvature concepts
  • Knowledge of intrinsic vs. extrinsic curvature
  • Basic comprehension of manifold theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of intrinsic curvature in General Relativity
  • Explore the mathematical framework of Riemannian geometry
  • Investigate higher-dimensional manifolds and their properties
  • Learn about the role of parallel transport in curved spaces
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity, differential geometry, and the mathematical foundations of spacetime curvature.

Narasoma
Messages
42
Reaction score
10
Everyone who is currently studying GR must be familiar with this picture. We find Riemann curvature by paraller transport a "test vector" around and see whether the vector changes its direction.

My question. How does it work with one dimensional Ring? A geomteric ring is intuitively curved but the only parallel transport possible for a vector to the point where it previously started, just give the sampe direction.
images.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing up intrinsic and extrinsic curvature. A 1d space has no intrinsic curvature (as you appear to have deduced), but you can embed it in a higher dimensional space where its tangent vector field (also embedded in that space) need not always point in the same direction. This latter is what you are calling "intuitively" curved.

GR cares about intrinsic curvature. Spacetime isn't embedded in a higher dimensional space that we are aware of, so extrinsic curvature isn't a useful concept.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Dale and Orodruin
Narasoma said:
How does it work with one dimensional Ring?
It doesn't. A one-dimensional manifold cannot have any intrinsic curvature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K