Good Morning.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am reading the first pages of the "Lessons of Functional Analysis" of Riesz and Nagy, because I learned that this book was the main source for Apostol chapter about the Lebesgue Integral, and I am trying to find a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for Lebesgue Integrals worked out within this approach (not Measure Theory).

One of the first theorems of Riesz-Nagy's book states: "Every monotonic function f(x) posseses a finite derivative at every point x with the possible exception of the points x of a set of measure zero".

To proof this T they use this lemma:

"Let g(x) be a continuous function defined in the closed interval (a, b), and let E be the set of points x interior to this interval and such that there exists and e lying to the right of x with g(e) > g(x). Then the set E is either empty or an open set, i.e., it decomposes into a finite number or a denumerable infinity of open and disjoint intervals (a_k, b_k) (the underline is mine), and g(a_k) < g(b_k) for all these intervals".

Well I suppose I can follow the lemma's proof on the book but in this

statement there is something I did not know. Why to be E an opet set implies that it decomposes into a finite number or a denumerable infinity of open and disjoint intervals ???

Thanks for your answers.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Riesz Lemma

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**