What is the Initial Mass of Fuel Needed for a Rocket to Reach 0.1c?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the initial mass of fuel required for a rocket to achieve a final velocity of 0.1c, using a hypothetical exhaust speed of 3 × 105 m/s. The derived equation for initial mass is m0 = m eΔv/ve, where Δv is the change in velocity and ve is the exhaust velocity. Participants clarified that the initial velocity of the rocket should be zero, not the exhaust speed, and emphasized the need for consistent terminology in applying the rocket equation. Additionally, the discussion highlighted the importance of considering relativistic effects when dealing with speeds approaching a significant fraction of the speed of light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
  • Familiarity with relativistic physics concepts
  • Knowledge of exhaust velocity and its role in rocket propulsion
  • Basic algebra for manipulating exponential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relativistic rocket equation for high-speed travel
  • Learn about the implications of exhaust velocity on rocket design
  • Explore the physics of chemical propulsion versus advanced propulsion systems
  • Investigate the calculations involved in achieving near-light-speed travel
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and students in advanced physics courses focusing on rocket propulsion and relativistic mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

Dopplershift
Messages
58
Reaction score
9
The problem states:
Typical chemical fuels yield exhaust speeds of the order of 103 m/s. Let us imagine we had a fuel that gives v0 = 3 × 105 m/s. What initial mass of fuel would the rocket need in order to attain a final velocity of 0.1c for a final mass of 1 ton?

I derived the equation in the first part of the problem:
\begin{equation}
v - v_0 = v_e \ln(\frac{m_0}{m})
\end{equation}

Solving for the initial mass, m, yields
\begin{equation}
m_0 = me^{\frac{\Delta v}{v_e)}}
\end{equation}

I plug in that.

0.1c = 3.0*10^7
v0 = 3.0*10^5
vee = 1.0*10^3
v - v0 = 3.0 *10^7 - 3.0*10^5 = 2.97*10^7
m = 1000 kg
I plug in these numbers and I am getting infinity. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial velocity should be 0, not 3*105 m/s.

3*105 m/s is the exhaust velocity of the hypothetical fuel, the number for chemical rockets is just given as comparison. The number will be very large, but you should't get infinity anywhere.

Please work with units, that makes it easier (especially for you) to spot mistakes.
 
mfb said:
The initial velocity should be 0, not 3*105 m/s.

3*105 m/s is the exhaust velocity of the hypothetical fuel, the number for chemical rockets is just given as comparison. The number will be very large, but you should't get infinity anywhere.

I'm confused, how is the initial velocity zero? It says that the fuel gives us a v0 of 3.0*105?

The problem is when I plug in the values of the conditions into my final equation, (equation 2).
 
Based on your formulas, m0 calculates to (1000 kg)*e^29700, which is approx 3.5 x 10^12901 (not infinity), but too large for your calculator.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
scottdave said:
Based on your formulas, m0 calculates to (1000 kg)*e^29700, which is approx 3.5 x 10^12901 (not infinity), but too large for your calculator.
Thank you!
 
Dopplershift said:
how is the initial velocity zero? It says that the fuel gives us a v0 of 3.0*105?
If that v0 is the initial speed of the rocket then the question makes no sense. How can the fuel give it that initial speed, before any fuel is burnt? I believe v0 is the exhaust speed, and the question is saying that although a typical exhaust speed is only 1000m/s, just suppose we had one with an exhaust speed 300 times as great.
 
haruspex said:
If that v0 is the initial speed of the rocket then the question makes no sense. How can the fuel give it that initial speed, before any fuel is burnt? I believe v0 is the exhaust speed, and the question is saying that although a typical exhaust speed is only 1000m/s, just suppose we had one with an exhaust speed 300 times as great.
That is how I interpreted the question as well.
 
Dopplershift said:
Thank you!
In perspective, the mass of the Earth is 5.97 x 10^24 kg.
 
  • Like
Likes Dopplershift
Dopplershift said:
The problem states:
Typical chemical fuels yield exhaust speeds of the order of 103 m/s. Let us imagine we had a fuel that gives v0 = 3 × 105 m/s. What initial mass of fuel would the rocket need in order to attain a final velocity of 0.1c for a final mass of 1 ton?

I derived the equation in the first part of the problem:
\begin{equation}
v - v_0 = v_e \ln(\frac{m_0}{m})
\end{equation}

Solving for the initial mass, m, yields
\begin{equation}
m_0 = me^{\frac{\Delta v}{v_e)}}
\end{equation}

I plug in that.

0.1c = 3.0*10^7
v0 = 3.0*10^5
vee = 1.0*10^3
v - v0 = 3.0 *10^7 - 3.0*10^5 = 2.97*10^7
m = 1000 kg
I plug in these numbers and I am getting infinity. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks!

Your use of ##v_0## is inconsistent: in the rocket equation, ##v_0=## initial speed of the rocket, That is ##v_0 = 0## nowhere near ##3 \times 10^5## (m/s). The "speed" ##3 \times 10^5## (m/s) is the speed of the exhaust gas relative to the rocket body.

One final quibble: the rocket equation as you wrote it is for non-relativistic rockets, using classical mechanics and Newton's equations of motion. The final speed ##0.1 c## sought in this problem is getting a bit into territory where relativity matters, so in pirnciple one ought to use a relativistic version of the rocket eqution. Of course, it will make very little difference in this particular problem---but it is always a good idea to know what kinds of approximations you are using.
 
  • #10
This problem is from May, it is unlikely that someone is still working on it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K