Roman vs. Greek letters for variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter oneamp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of Roman and Greek letters for variables in mathematical writing. Participants emphasize the importance of readability and context when choosing variable names, noting that while any variable can theoretically be used, clarity should be prioritized. Common conventions include using Greek letters for angles and Roman letters for dimensionless parameters. The use of subscripts is deemed acceptable, provided they do not create confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical notation and variable representation
  • Familiarity with LaTeX typesetting for mathematical expressions
  • Knowledge of common conventions in mathematical writing
  • Awareness of readability principles in technical writing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research LaTeX formatting for subscripts and superscripts
  • Explore conventions for variable naming in mathematical papers
  • Learn about the use of Greek letters in mathematical contexts
  • Study readability techniques in technical writing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers, students in technical fields, and anyone involved in writing mathematical papers who seeks to improve clarity and communication in their notation.

oneamp
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
I am writing a paper and I was using 'o' for a variable. Then I decided that it looked too much like '0', and thought I might use capital omega. How do I know when I should and should not use Greek letters?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of paper? Different letters are used for different purposes.
 
In principle, you could use any variable you want. Mathematically, everything is allowed. However, you should consider readibility. For example, using ##\pi## as a variable in equations is probably not the best idea. Or using ##x## as the function symbol and ##f## as variable to get stuff like ##x(f) = f^2 + f + 1## is also something you should want to avoid.

But it really depends on context.
 
Thank you. So it's arbitrary. Also, is using something like [smth]_{sub}, where sub is subscript, ok to use, or should I push the limit with unrelated (phonetically) roman and greek letters, instead of words with a subscript?
 
oneamp said:
Thank you. So it's arbitrary. Also, is using something like [smth]_{sub}, where sub is subscript, ok to use, or should I push the limit with unrelated (phonetically) roman and greek letters, instead of words with a subscript?

Subscripts are perfectly fine. But again, it depends on the context. The end result should be a readable text, so notation shouldn't be confusing. That's the only rule.
 
micromass said:
Subscripts are perfectly fine. But again, it depends on the context. The end result should be a readable text, so notation shouldn't be confusing. That's the only rule.

I was more curious about using whole words above the subscript. Eg. ## var_{now}##; can't ##var## be misinterpreted as three variables? Or is it ok to use it?

Thank you again
 
oneamp said:
I was more curious about using whole words above the subscript. Eg. ## var_{now}##; can't ##var## be misinterpreted as three variables? Or is it ok to use it?

Thank you again

It should be acceptable, but it's certainly something that you don't see very much.

In any case, use the text environment if you're using this. So

Code:
\text{var}_\text{now}

To get ##\text{var}_\text{now}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you
 
oneamp said:
Thank you. So it's arbitrary. Also, is using something like [smth]_{sub}, where sub is subscript, ok to use, or should I push the limit with unrelated (phonetically) roman and greek letters, instead of words with a subscript?

micromass said:
Subscripts are perfectly fine. But again, it depends on the context. The end result should be a readable text, so notation shouldn't be confusing. That's the only rule.

We have learned some unofficial conventions. f and sometimes g and h are often used for function names. Certain greek letters are often used as angle measure variables.

One maybe obvious reason for single-character variable names is that we place factors next to each other with the understanding that if no operation symbol is shown, then multiplication is understood. We can not try to spell human-language words with these kinds of variables. Why? Each letter is supposed to be a separate number.
 
  • #10
I've seen both in the literature but Greek letters are always more common, I think Roman letters are more typically used for dimensionless parameters like in numerical simulations or for geometric quantities (x,y,z, L etc.)

Plenty of Greek letters with Roman super/subscripts in papers, though the super/subscripts are almost universally in roman font instead of the default TeX font, something I was told by my senior year project advisor. Ie:

\Omega_{\rm{something}}
 
  • #11
It's not arbitrary. This is a form of communication, and you should pick your variable names to facilitate communication. For example, you could say that the area of a circle is \pi^2 R, where \pi is the radius of the circle and R is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. And you'd be technically right. But this would be a very confusing thing to say.
 
  • #12
micromass said:
In principle, you could use any variable you want. Mathematically, everything is allowed. However, you should consider readibility. For example, using ##\pi## as a variable in equations is probably not the best idea. Or using ##x## as the function symbol and ##f## as variable to get stuff like ##x(f) = f^2 + f + 1## is also something you should want to avoid.

But it really depends on context.

Thanks. I am going to start doing that all the time, but I like to use functions and operators that act to the left and no parenthesis so I will write

##f\mathrm{x}=f^2 + f + 1 \\
f^2\mathrm{x}=f^4 + f^2 + 1 \\
\Xi\pi\sin\mathrm{d}=\Xi\pi\mathrm{d}(\Xi\pi\ \cos)=(\Xi \mathrm{d}\pi+\pi\mathrm{d} \Xi)(\Xi\pi\ \cos)##

looks great
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K