MHB Roots of $g'(x)$ in AP: Proving the Theory

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if the roots of a fourth degree polynomial g(x)=0 are in arithmetic progression (AP), then the roots of its derivative g'(x)=0 must also be in AP. Participants share their solutions and insights, highlighting the elegance of the proof. One user humorously compliments another's intelligence while offering a treat as a gesture of appreciation. Additional solutions and references from online sources are also mentioned, contributing to the exploration of the topic. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical relationship between the roots of a polynomial and its derivative.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
The roots of a fourth degree polynomial $g(x)=0$ are in an AP (arithmetic progression). Prove that the roots of $g'(x)=0$ must also form an AP.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

Without loss of generality, let us horizontally translate the function $g$ such that it is even in our coordinate system:

$$g(x)=(x+a)(x+3a)(x-a)(x-3a)=\left(x^2-a^2\right)\left(x^2-9a^2\right)$$

Hence:

$$g'(x)=2x\left(x^2-9a^2\right)+2x\left(x^2-a^2\right)=4x(x+\sqrt{5}a)(x-\sqrt{5}a)=0$$

We see that the roots of $g'$ are in fact in an AP.
 
MarkFL said:
My solution:

Without loss of generality, let us horizontally translate the function $g$ such that it is even in our coordinate system:

$$g(x)=(x+a)(x+3a)(x-a)(x-3a)=\left(x^2-a^2\right)\left(x^2-9a^2\right)$$

Hence:

$$g'(x)=2x\left(x^2-9a^2\right)+2x\left(x^2-a^2\right)=4x(x+\sqrt{5}a)(x-\sqrt{5}a)=0$$

We see that the roots of $g'$ are in fact in an AP.

Aww...you're certainly very intelligent and smart, aren't you, MarkFL? Hehehe...

For this so elegant solution, I want to treat you something that you really like, and that is, ta da! Pecan Pie!

http://www.countryliving.com/cm/countryliving/images/Yd/Pecan-Pie-southern-pecan-pie-de.jpg
 
I also want to share a solution that I saw online, and here it goes:

Let's consider only the case with four real distinct roots $a,\,a+r,\,a+2r,\,a+3r$ with $r>0$.

Then $g(x)=k(x-a)(x-a-r)(x-a-2r)(x-a-3r)$ for some $k,\,r\ne 0$.

And so $g\left(\dfrac{rx}{2}+a-\dfrac{3r}{2}\right)=\dfrac{kr^4}{16}(x-3)(x-1)(x+1)(x+3)=\dfrac{kr^4}{16}(x^4-10x^2+9)$

$\begin{align*}\dfrac{r}{2}g'\left(\dfrac{rx}{2}+a-\dfrac{3r}{2}\right)&=\dfrac{kr^4}{16}(4x^3-20x)\\&=\dfrac{kr^4}{4}x(x^2-5)\\&=\dfrac{kr^4}{4}x(x-\sqrt{5})(x+\sqrt{5})\end{align*}$

Since $g'\left(\dfrac{rx}{2}+a-\dfrac{3r}{2}\right)$ has three distinct roots in AP, it is immediate to get that the roots of $g'(x)$ must also form an AP.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top