MHB Roots of polynomial equations 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erfan1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Roots
Erfan1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Obtain the sum of the squares of the roots of the equation x^4 + 3x^3 + 5x^2 + 12x + 4 = 0 .
Deduce that this equation does not have more than 2 real roots .
Show that , in fact , the equation has exactly 2 real roots in the interval -3 < x < 0 .
Denoting these roots α and β , and the other 2 roots by γand δ , show that :
modulus of γ = modulus of δ = 2/(radical(αβ) .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin with:

$$f(x)=x^4+3x^3+5x^2+12x+4$$

Obviously, the real roots must be negative, and the rational roots theorem shows us that none are rational.

So, let's see if this quartic can be factored:

$$f(x)=x^2\left(x^2+4 \right)+3x\left(x^2+4 \right)+\left(x^2+4 \right)$$

$$f(x)=\left(x^2+3x+1 \right)\left(x^2+4 \right)$$

Now you may obtain the roots explicitly, simplifying matters greatly.
 
Erfan said:
Obtain the sum of the squares of the roots of the equation x^4 + 3x^3 + 5x^2 + 12x + 4 = 0 .
Deduce that this equation does not have more than 2 real roots .
Show that , in fact , the equation has exactly 2 real roots in the interval -3 < x < 0 .
Denoting these roots α and β , and the other 2 roots by γand δ , show that :
modulus of γ = modulus of δ = 2/(radical(αβ) .

Let $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ and $\delta$ be the roots of the equation $x^4+3x^3+5x^2+12x+4=0$.

If we're allowed to use Newton's Identities to solve the first part of the problem, we see that

$(\alpha+ \beta+ \gamma+\delta)(1)+(1)(3)=0\;\;\rightarrow\;\alpha+ \beta+ \gamma+\delta=-3$

$(\alpha^2+ \beta^2+ \gamma^2+\delta^2)(1)+(3)(\alpha+ \beta+ \gamma+\delta)+(2)(5)=0\;\;\rightarrow\;\alpha^2+ \beta^2+ \gamma^2+\delta^2=-1$

Descartes' Rule of Signs tell us [$f(x)=x^4+3x^3+5x^2+12x+4$ and $f(-x)=x^4-3x^3+5x^2-12x+4$] there are 4, 2 or 0 negative solutions and the function $f(x)$ has no positive solutions.

Since $\alpha^2+ \beta^2+ \gamma^2+\delta^2=-1$, it can't be the case where all 4 of the roots are real negative roots. So, we can deduce now that the given equation does not have more than 2 real roots .

Notice that $f(-3)=13$, $f(-2)=-8$, so we know that there is a root in the interval $-3<x<-2$ by the Intermediate Value Theorem.

Also $f(-1)=-5$, $f(0)=4$, the other negative root in the interval $-1<x<-0$.

Combining these two results shows that the equation has exactly 2 real roots in the interval $-3<x<0$ .

Let both of the imaginary roots of the equation $\gamma$ and $\delta$ be expressed in the form $\gamma=a+bi$ and $\delta=a-bi$, we're asked to prove $|\gamma|=|\delta|=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\alpha\beta}}$ is true, or equivalently, $\sqrt{a^2+b^2}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\alpha\beta}}$ is true.

Vieta's formula tells us the product of the 4 roots $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ and $\delta$ is 4.

$\alpha\beta\gamma\delta=4$

$(a+bi)(a-bi)\alpha\beta=4$

$(a^2+b^2)\alpha\beta=4$

$a^2+b^2=\frac{4}{\alpha\beta}$

$\therefore \sqrt{a^2+b^2}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\alpha\beta}}$(QED)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top