MHB Ross' question via email about a derivative.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prove It
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Email
AI Thread Summary
The derivative of the function y = 16[ sinh(7t) ]^3 cosh(7t) with respect to t can be calculated using the product rule. The derivatives of the individual components are found, leading to the expression for dy/dt. An alternative method involves simplifying the function using hyperbolic identities, ultimately yielding the same derivative result. The final derivative is expressed as dy/dt = 56 cosh(28t) - 56 cosh(14t). Both methods confirm the equivalence of the results, showcasing different approaches to differentiation.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
What is the derivative (with respect to t) of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = 16\,\left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^3 \cosh{(7\,t )} \end{align*}$?

One way to do this is to apply the product rule. To do this, we need to know the derivative of each factor.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t} \, \left\{ \left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^3 \right\} &= 7 \cdot \cosh{( 7\,t )} \cdot 3\left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^2 \\ &= 21\cosh{(7\,t)}\left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^2 \end{align*}$

and

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\,\left[ \cosh{(7\,t)} \right] = 7\,\sinh{(7\,t)} \end{align*}$

so that means

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}t} &= 16 \, \left\{ \left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^3 \cdot 7\,\sinh{(7\,t)} + 21\cosh{(7\,t)}\left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^2 \cdot \cosh{(7\,t)} \right\} \\ &= 112\,\left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^2 \, \left\{ \left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^2 + 3\, \left[ \cosh{(7\,t)} \right] ^2 \right\} \end{align*}$A more sophisticated method is to use hyperbolic identities to simplify the function before trying to differentiate.

Since $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sinh{(2\,x)} \equiv 2\sinh{(x)}\cosh{(x)} \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \cosh{(2\,x)} \equiv 1 + 2\,\left[ \sinh{(x)} \right] ^2 \end{align*}$ that means

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y &= 16\,\left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^3\cosh{(7\,t)} \\ &= 8 \,\left[ \sinh{(7\,t)} \right] ^2 \cdot 2\sinh{(7\,t)}\cosh{(7\,t)} \\ &= 8 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \, \left[ \cosh{(14\,t)} - 1 \right] \sinh{(14\,t)} \\ &= 4\cosh{(14\,t)}\sinh{(14\,t)} - 4\sinh{(14\,t)} \\ &= 2\cdot 2\cosh{(14\,t)}\sinh{(14\,t)} - 4\sinh{(14\,t)} \\ &= 2 \sinh{(28\,t)} - 4\sinh{(14\,t)} \\ \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}t} &= 2 \cdot 28 \cosh{(28\,t)} - 4\cdot 14\cosh{(14\,t)} \\ &= 56\cosh{(28\,t)} - 56\cosh{(14\,t)} \end{align*}$

This can be shown to be equivalent to the answer given above.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top