How Would Melting Polar Ice Caps Affect Earth's Day Length?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating how the melting of polar ice caps and a subsequent 10-meter rise in sea levels would affect Earth's day length. Participants express confusion about the necessary calculations, particularly regarding the moment of inertia and changes in Earth's radius due to the added water. One suggested approach involves calculating the moment of inertia of a hollow sphere of water at Earth's radius and then determining the total moment of inertia by adding it to Earth's existing moment. The importance of conserving angular momentum is emphasized, as it relates to changes in Earth's rotation speed and day length. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in this physics problem and the need for further clarification.
zoner7
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the melting of the polar ice caps were to raise the water level on the Earth by 10m, by how much would the say be lengthened? Assume the moment of inertia of the ice in the polar ices caps in negligible (they are very near the axis), and assume that the extra water spreads out uniformly over the entire surface of teh Earth (that is, neglect the area of the continents compared with the area of the oceans). The moment of inertia of the Earth(now) is 8.1 X 10&37 kg m^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



good luck... I have no idea how to even go about doing this. I know that i need to examine the radius increase of the Earth do to the water level changing, but since I can't look up any values that aren't given to me, I really have no idea where to even start. if anyone has even the slightest inkling of what to do, I'd love to hear it.

thank you in advance

hmm I suppose that the moment of intertia of a sphere is key:

2/5 MR^2
We can set 2/5 MR^2 = x.

we know that this increases to 2/5 M(R + 10m)^2.

Then the change in the moment of inertia would be equal to [2/5 M(R + 10m)^2 - x], or 8.1 X 10&37 kg m^2 - x.

That's one step down :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zoner7 said:

Homework Statement



If the melting of the polar ice caps were to raise the water level on the Earth by 10m, by how much would the say be lengthened? Assume the moment of inertia of the ice in the polar ices caps in negligible (they are very near the axis), and assume that the extra water spreads out uniformly over the entire surface of teh Earth (that is, neglect the area of the continents compared with the area of the oceans). The moment of inertia of the Earth(now) is 8.1 X 10&37 kg m^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



good luck... I have no idea how to even go about doing this. I know that i need to examine the radius increase of the Earth do to the water level changing, but since I can't look up any values that aren't given to me, I really have no idea where to even start. if anyone has even the slightest inkling of what to do, I'd love to hear it.

thank you in advance

hmm I suppose that the moment of intertia of a sphere is key:

2/5 MR^2
We can set 2/5 MR^2 = x.

we know that this increases to 2/5 M(R + 10m)^2.

Then the change in the moment of inertia would be equal to [2/5 M(R + 10m)^2 - x], or 8.1 X 10&37 kg m^2 - x.

That's one step down :)

I'd have to wonder if a more useful approach wouldn't be to calculate the moment of a 10 m hollow sphere of water at the radius of the earth. (Calculate the surface area of Earth times 10 m times mass of water to get the mass.) Then add that to the known moment of the Earth to arrive at the total moment.

Because the mass of the water won't be as much as the weight of the magma based densities of the landmass.

Since angular momentum needs to be conserved ... you can get to the change in rotation.
 
I still could not reach the answer, please can you explain more?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
335
Views
16K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K