Round trip to earth in a straight line?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of traveling from Earth in a straight line and the implications of the universe's curvature on such a journey. Participants explore theoretical aspects of space-time, curvature, and the expansion of the universe, raising questions about the nature of straight lines in curved spaces and the possibility of returning to an origin point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that returning to Earth after traveling in a straight line is contingent on the curvature of the universe, with one stating that the universe is currently believed to be flat.
  • Others argue that if the universe has positive curvature, it may allow for a return to the starting point, drawing analogies with 2D surfaces like a basketball.
  • A participant mentions that even in curved space-time, traveling along a geodesic does not guarantee a return to the origin.
  • Some participants highlight the rapid expansion of the universe, suggesting that it may prevent any traveler from returning to their point of origin, regardless of curvature.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of higher dimensions and whether curved space-time can be embedded in them, with differing interpretations of what this means.
  • One participant raises a hypothetical scenario about light traveling at infinite speed and questions its implications for returning to Earth, which is deemed moot due to the finite speed of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on whether it is possible to return to Earth after traveling in a straight line. There are competing theories regarding the curvature of the universe and its implications for such travel, as well as differing opinions on the effects of the universe's expansion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on the current understanding of the universe's curvature and expansion, which may be subject to change as new research emerges. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the nature of straight lines in curved spaces and the implications of higher dimensions.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
I talked to an astronomy student recently, and he told me that if I travel out from Earth in a straight line, I will finally return to earth. Is this true?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That would only be true if the universe had curvature, current studies show that the universe is completely flat.
 
Well, he told me that it is bent in higher dimensions. Much in the same way as a imagined 2D-creature wouldn't understand why he comes back to the samt point after walking round earth.
 
It is, in fact, not known whether the total curvature of the universe is positive, which is what would give that result (The Earth does, in fact, have positive curvature). If this person told you that would result because the universe is "bent in higher dimensions" he didn't know what he was talking about! There are some string theories that require higher dimensions and it is thought that we don't "notice" them because they are "curled" up- imagine a 2 dimensional paper rolled up into a very, very, tight cylinder: it now looks like it is one-dimensional.

However, that has nothing to do with what would happen if we were walking (or flying in a space ship) in a "regular" dimension that we do notice!
 
But if the universe has a curvature, it will be practically impossible to travel in a straight line and return to earth, no?
 
kasse said:
But if the universe has a curvature, it will be practically impossible to travel in a straight line and return to earth, no?

The contrary is true, if the universe has NO curvature, it's impossible to travel in a straight line and return to Earth.

We'll use a 2D analogue: A basketball. The surface of the basketball is a 2D space with positive curvature. Traveling in a straight line from a point along the surface of the ball will eventually lead back to that same point. Now take that same basketball and flatten it. Now there's no way to return to the origin by traveling in a straight line.
 
kasse said:
But if the universe has a curvature, it will be practically impossible to travel in a straight line and return to earth, no?
That is correct, there are no straight lines in a curved space-time.
The thing that comes closest is a so-called geodesic.

But even then it is not automatically true that if you travel away from A along a geodesic you will meet A again, even if space-time has a positive curvature.

HallsofIvy said:
If this person told you that would result because the universe is "bent in higher dimensions" he didn't know what he was talking about!
I would not go that far in saying that.
While it is custom to describe curved space-time as intrinsic curvature, it would not be impossible to embed it in a higher dimension.
 
Last edited:
The universe is expanding too rapidly for any traveller to return to their point of 'origin', irrespective of curvature.
 
Chronos said:
The universe is expanding too rapidly for any traveller to return to their point of 'origin', irrespective of curvature.

Yes, indeed.

By the way, do the researchers know more about whether the universe is flat or if it will start to contract or just continue to expand? I remember from high school that my physics book said we would probably never know.
 
  • #10
MeJennifer said:
That is correct, there are no straight lines in a curved space-time.
The thing that comes closest is a so-called geodesic.

But even then it is not automatically true that if you travel away from A along a geodesic you will meet A again, even if space-time has a positive curvature.


I would not go that far in saying that.
While it is custom to describe curved space-time as intrinsic curvature, it would not be impossible to embed it in a higher dimension.
You are right. I had interpreted "bent in higher dimensions" as meaning "curled up in some dimensions". I think your interpretation as "embedded in higher dimensions" it better.
 
  • #11
kasse said:
I talked to an astronomy student recently, and he told me that if I travel out from Earth in a straight line, I will finally return to earth. Is this true?

This can quite definitely be ruled out, because of the expansion of space.

Even when sending out a light signal, it can never catch up with the drift of space at large, because of the space expansion.

So, ultimately, this has the effect of that in all respects, the universe can best be seen as infinitely large.
 
  • #12
heusdens said:
This can quite definitely be ruled out, because of the expansion of space.

Even when sending out a light signal, it can never catch up with the drift of space at large, because of the space expansion.

So, ultimately, this has the effect of that in all respects, the universe can best be seen as infinitely large.


But if light had infinite speed, would it then "return" to Earth after beeing sent out?
 
  • #13
Unknown. But, since light has a finite [and fairly well measured speed], the question is moot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K