This is little Rudin's proof 7.25: If K is compact, f_n complex and continous functions and if {f_n} is pointwise bounded and equicontinuous on K, then {f_n} contains a uniformly convergent subsequence.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The proof requires a countable dense subset of K, called E. Then by compactness (and density???), there exists finitely many x_i elements of E s.t K is covered by U V(x_i, delta). Then the usual triangle inequality applies.

I don't see why a countable dense subset of K is needed. Why can we not directly invoke compactness and choose the x_i's elements of K, instead? U V(x, delta), x elements of K, is an infinite cover of K, so why can we not directly choose the x_i's? The only requirement in the proof is that d(x,x_i)<delta be valid for some i from 1 to m and for all x elements of K.

What am I completely missing?

Thanks in advance!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Rudin's proof of Arzela-Ascoli teorem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Rudin's proof Arzela | Date |
---|---|

Binomial theorem in rudin | Jul 7, 2012 |

Baby rudin, Limit of nth root of p | Jul 4, 2012 |

Ohda!: Definition of Order in Baby Rudin | Mar 21, 2012 |

Alternative proof of a theorem in Rudin | Dec 23, 2011 |

Rudin 1.21 Problem understanding proof of unique positive root to the | Nov 25, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**