Run Internal Combustion Engine on Liquid Oxygen

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamapilot94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Engine
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of running an internal combustion engine on liquid oxygen (LOX) instead of air, exploring theoretical implications, practical challenges, and historical precedents. Participants consider various aspects including safety, engineering challenges, and alternative oxygen sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the practicality of using LOX due to the energy required to bring it to ignition temperature.
  • Historical references are made to Soviet submarines that attempted similar implementations, highlighting safety concerns and catastrophic failures.
  • One participant suggests using the hot exhaust manifold to preheat LOX, arguing that nitrogen in air is not beneficial for combustion.
  • Concerns are raised about the dangers of having LOX on a submarine, as it could provide a source of oxygen for fires.
  • Another viewpoint proposes that compressed air from scuba tanks could be a safer alternative, although it may not provide sufficient oxygen volume for practical use.
  • Participants emphasize the need for specialized engine designs and materials when working with pure oxygen, noting the risks of ignition and the necessity for different lubrication systems.
  • One participant mentions that using pure oxygen could significantly increase the adiabatic flame temperature, potentially damaging engine components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and safety of using LOX in internal combustion engines, with no consensus reached. Some advocate for the idea while others highlight significant risks and challenges.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various limitations, including the need for specialized materials and designs to handle pure oxygen safely, as well as unresolved concerns about ignition risks and practical implementation challenges.

iamapilot94
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, i just want to know if its possible to run an internal combustion engine on liquid oxygen instead of air
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Seems to me, you'll expend a lot of energy getting the oxygen up to temperature or it will quash ignition.
 
I believe there used to be some soviet submarines that did something similar to this. Unfortunately it seemed that during the cold war... soviet engineering + safety = what?
So many of them had catastrophic fires killing many submariners and the idea was scrapped.
 
iamapilot94 said:
Hi, i just want to know if its possible to run an internal combustion engine on liquid oxygen instead of air

Sure. You could use the hot exhaust manifold to boil the LOX and preheat it. The nitrogen in the air does nothing useful except slightly cool and dilute the burning process, and you might need to fiddle with that a little. But, the idea would work OK - just makes things complicated and expensive.
 
thanks for the reply
i was having a idea to fit it on a commercial submarine so it doesn't have to pop up every 30 seconds
 
Well, the good old USSR thought of it too...there were some very big problems with it's implementation too...by having LOX on a submarine it gave a readily available source of O2 for fires which was the main down side.
 
I think simple compressed air, such as in a scuba tank, would be sufficient, not to mention less dangerous. Of cource, the volume would be prohibitive from a practical standpoint. Scuba tanks generally hold only about 80-100 cubic feet at roughly 2500-3500 psi.
 
pantaz said:
I think simple compressed air, such as in a scuba tank, would be sufficient, not to mention less dangerous. Of cource, the volume would be prohibitive from a practical standpoint. Scuba tanks generally hold only about 80-100 cubic feet at roughly 2500-3500 psi.
Which is why it wouldn't be sufficient. Lose the nitrogen, and you increase your oxygen by a factor of 4.
 
iamapilot94 said:
thanks for the reply
i was having a idea to fit it on a commercial submarine so it doesn't have to pop up every 30 seconds
The German Navy designed and built a fuel cell submarine about 8 years ago having liquid oxygen storage. Hydrogen is stored in metal hydride canisters. Here's a couple of references if you're interested.

http://www2.sea.siemens.com/NR/rdonlyres/D3201AC8-C746-4EC8-975A-64E607662195/0/SiemensPresentsFuelCellattheAdvanceNavalPropulsionSymposium.pdf
http://www.gizmag.com/go/3434/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
iamapilot94 said:
thanks for the reply
i was having a idea to fit it on a commercial submarine so it doesn't have to pop up every 30 seconds

I suppose you might use a snorkel?
 
  • #11
iamapilot94 said:
Hi, i just want to know if its possible to run an internal combustion engine on liquid oxygen instead of air
Have you ever talked to anyone that has worked with pure O2? How about done any research? The HUGE thing about pure O2 is that, for your application, you would have to develop an engine that had a completely different form of lubrication. Pure O2 can not come into contact with any form of petroleum. Seals would also have to be changed. Anything that comes in contact with pure O2 in an industrial setting has to be specially cleaned and packaged. You would also have to be knowledgeable in the use of valves. Pure O2 can use as its source for combustion, the very piping it is contained in. One of the main forms of disaster is through compression ignition fires in pure O2 systems.

What you are proposing is not an easy task and is very dangerous.
 
  • #12
Pure O2 will increase your adiabatic flame temperature (probably to the melting point of many of your engine parts).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
819
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K