S-matrix formula from Lippmann-schwinger eqn

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter muppet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula S-matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on deriving the S-matrix formula from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation as presented in Weinberg's Quantum Field Theory text. The expression discussed is S_{\beta\alpha}=\delta(\beta-\alpha)-2\pi i\delta(E_\alpha -E_\beta)T_{\beta\alpha}, where T^{\pm}_{\beta \alpha} are the matrix elements defined in terms of the scattering potential V and the eigenstates \Phi_{\alpha}. A key point raised is the correct representation of the Dirac delta function, which is essential for the derivation. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding regarding the delta function's role in integrals, emphasizing its distributional nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with the Lippmann-Schwinger equation
  • Knowledge of matrix elements in quantum mechanics
  • Comprehension of Dirac delta functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation in detail
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Dirac delta functions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Weinberg's Quantum Field Theory text, focusing on chapters discussing the S-matrix
  • Investigate the implications of scattering theory in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers in particle physics who are looking to deepen their understanding of S-matrix theory and scattering processes.

muppet
Messages
602
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
In chapter 3.2 of Weinberg's QFT text he asserts that one can derive the expression
S_{\beta\alpha}=\delta(\beta-\alpha)-2\pi i\delta(E_\alpha -E_\beta)T_{\beta\alpha}
for the S-matrix in terms of the matrix elements T^{\pm}_{\beta \alpha}=(\Phi_\beta , V\Psi^{\pm}_\alpha), where I'm using Weinberg's "linear algebraic" notation for the inner product of state vectors, V is a scattering potential, \Phi_{\alpha} is an eigenstate of a free hamiltonian H_0 with eigenvalue E_\alpha, and the \Psi^{\pm} are in/out states, from the Lippmann -Schwinger equations
\Psi^{\pm}_\alpha=\Phi_{\alpha}+(E_\alpha-H_0 \pm i\epsilon )^{-1} V\Psi^{\pm}_\alpha.

However, he never actually gets around to it. Here's my attempt, which seems to get me close but contains either a mistake or a pathologically strange representation of the delta function.

Consider the matrix element (\Psi_{\beta}^-,V\Psi_\alpha^+). We apply the Lippman-Schwinger equations to both the 'in' and 'out' states and equate the results.
Note that I'll use \Psi^{\pm}=\int d\gamma(\Phi_\gamma,\Psi^{\pm})\Phi_\gamma a few times.
Starting with the in state:
(\Psi_{\beta}^-,V\Psi_\alpha^{\plus})=(\Psi_{\beta}^-,V\Phi_{\alpha}+V(E_\alpha-H_0 + i\epsilon )^{-1} V\Psi^{+}_\alpha)
=(\Psi_{\beta}^-,V\Phi_{\alpha})+(\Psi_{\beta}^-,V(E_\alpha-H_0 + i\epsilon )^{-1} V\Psi^{+}_\alpha)
=(T^{-}_{\alpha \beta})^*+\int d \gamma (\Psi_{\beta}^-,V(E_\alpha-H_0 + i\epsilon )^{-1} T^+_{\gamma\alpha}\Phi_\gamma)
=T^{-}_{ \beta \alpha}+\int d \gamma (E_\alpha-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} T^+_{\gamma\alpha} (T^-_{\gamma \beta})^*=T^{-}_{ \beta \alpha}+\int d \gamma (E_\alpha-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} T^-_{\beta \gamma}T^+_{\gamma\alpha}

Now the out state:
(\Psi_{\beta}^-,V\Psi_\alpha^{+})=(\Phi_{\beta}+(E_\blpha-H_0 - i\epsilon )^{-1} V\Psi^-_\beta,V\Psi_\alpha^{+})
=(\Phi_{\beta},V\Psi_\alpha^{+})+(\Psi^-_\beta,V(E_\beta-H_0 + i\epsilon )^{-1} V\Psi_\alpha^{+})
=T^{+}_{\beta \alpha}+ \int d \gamma (\Psi_{\beta}^-,V(E_\alpha-H_0 + i\epsilon )^{-1} T^+_{\gamma\alpha}\Phi_\gamma)
=T^{+}_{ \beta \alpha}+\int d \gamma (E_\beta-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} T^-_{\beta \gamma}T^+_{\gamma\alpha}

Now we can get a relationship between T^{+}_{ \beta \alpha} and T^{-}_{ \beta \alpha} by expanding the defining matrix element for in states using the completeness relation for the out states:
T^{+}_{ \beta \alpha}=(\Phi_\beta,V\Psi_\alpha^+)=\int d\gamma (\Phi_\beta,V(\Psi^-_\gamma,\Psi_\alpha^+)\Psi^-_\gamma)=\int d\gamma S_{\gamma \alpha}T^-_{\beta\gamma}

So equating the two expansions of (\Psi_{\beta}^-,V\Psi_\alpha^{\plus}) and rearranging for T^+_{\beta\alpha} leads to
T^+_{\beta\alpha}=\int d\gamma S_{\gamma \alpha}T^-_{\beta\gamma}
=T^{-}_{ \beta \alpha}+\int d \gamma (E_\alpha-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} T^-_{\beta \gamma}T^+_{\gamma\alpha} - (E_\beta-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} T^-_{\beta \gamma}T^+_{\gamma\alpha}
=\int d \gamma T^-_{\beta \gamma}(\delta(\alpha-\gamma)+\{(E_\alpha-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} - (E_\beta-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} \}T^+_{\gamma\alpha} )

Now this argument is only correct if
\{(E_\alpha-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} - (E_\beta-E_\gamma + i\epsilon )^{-1} \} = -2\pi i\delta(E_\alpha -E_\beta)
inside an integral, which really doesn't appear to be true.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, I've spent most of today deriving this and then trying to correct my error. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A:I think the problem is that you are not using the right expression for the delta function.$\delta(E_\alpha-E_\beta)$ is a Dirac delta function, which means that it is equal to $0$ everywhere expect for $E_\alpha=E_\beta$, where it is equal to $+\infty$. This means that it does not appear as part of an integral.The expression $\frac{1}{2\pi i}\bigg(\frac{1}{E_\alpha-E_\beta+i\epsilon}-\frac{1}{E_\alpha-E_\beta-i\epsilon}\bigg)$ is a distribution, and it is equal to $\delta(E_\alpha-E_\beta)$ when it appears as part of an integral.That is why Weinberg's expression for the S-matrix contains this term.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K