MHB 정은's question at Yahoo Answers regarding depth of water in trough when half full

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the depth of water in a trapezoidal trough when it is half-full, specifically using the trapezium rule. The problem is simplified by focusing on the areas of two trapezia formed by the water line, rather than employing integration. The width of the trough at the water line is determined as a function of the water depth, leading to the formulation of the areas below and above the water line. By equating these areas and solving the resulting quadratic equation, the depth of water when the trough is half-full is calculated to be approximately 27.19 cm. This approach provides a clear method for solving similar problems involving trapezoidal cross-sections.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Integration using trapezium rule?

The diagram shows the cross section of a water-trough. One side is vertical and the other side slopes. Calculate the depth of water in the trough when it is exactly half-full. (Hint: this means the areas of two trapezia must be equal.)

https://plus.google.com/u/0/118370402069852386878/posts/Ei4LooTa5ze

Above link is shows the diagram of this question.

The answer to this question= 27.19cm

Please explain to me how to get this answer.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello 정은,

This problem does not require integration, or the trapezium rule to approximate a definite integral. While it could be used, it is simpler to just use the given hint.

To compute the areas of the trapezia in the cross-section of the trough above and below the water line, we need to know the width $w$ of the trough at the water line as a function of the depth of the water, which we are calling $d$. All linear measures are in cm.

We know this width increases linearly, and we know two points of the form $(d,w)$:

$(0,70)$ and $(50,100)$

and so the slope of the linear function is:

$$m=\frac{\Delta w}{\Delta h}=\frac{100-70}{50-0}=\frac{3}{5}$$

Thus, using the slope, and the first point in the point-slope formula, we get:

$$w-70=\frac{3}{5}(d-0)$$

$$w=\frac{3}{5}d+70$$

Now, using the formula for the area of a trapezium:

$$A=\frac{h}{2}(B+b)$$

We find the area $A_1$ of the trapezium below the water line is:

$$A_1=\frac{d}{2}\left(\frac{3}{5}d+70+70 \right)=\frac{d}{2}\left(\frac{3}{5}d+140 \right)$$

We find the area $A_2$ of the trapezium above the water line is:

$$A_2=\frac{50-d}{2}\left(100+\frac{3}{5}d+70 \right)=\frac{50-d}{2}\left(\frac{3}{5}d+170 \right)$$

Equating the two areas, we have:

$$\frac{d}{2}\left(\frac{3}{5}d+140 \right)=\frac{50-d}{2}\left(\frac{3}{5}d+170 \right)$$

Multiplying through by $10$ we get:

$$d(3d+700)=(50-d)(3d+850)$$

Distributing and arranging in standard quadratic form, we obtain:

$$3d^2+700d-21250=0$$

Application of the quadratic formula, and discarding the negative root, there results:

$$d=\frac{25}{3}\left(\sqrt{298}-14 \right)\approx27.1889708469339$$
 
Suppose we wish to generalize a bit, and let the width of the trapezoidal cross-section of a trough at the base and top be $w_1$ and $w_2$ respectively, where $w_1<w_2$. The depth of the trough we can call $h$, and we will, as before, let $d$ be the depth when the trough is $$k$$ full, where $0\le k\le1$.

To find the width $w$ of the trough at $d$, we note we have the points:

$$\left(0,w_1 \right),\,\left(h,w_2 \right)$$

and so the slope of the linear width function is:

$$m=\frac{w_2-w_1}{h}$$

and the point-slope formula gives us:

$$w=\frac{w_2-w_1}{h}d+w_1$$

Now, in order for the trough to be $$k$$ full, we require:

$$\frac{d}{2}\left(\frac{w_2-w_1}{h}d+2w_1 \right)=\frac{kh}{2}\left(w_1+w_2 \right)$$

Multiplying through by $2h$, and arranging in standard quadratic form in $d$, we obtain:

$$\left(w_2-w_1 \right)d^2+2hw_1d-kh^2\left(w_1+w_2 \right)=0$$

Applying the quadratic formula, and discarding the negative root, we find:

$$d=\frac{h\left(\sqrt{w_1^2+k\left(w_2^2-w_1^2 \right)}-w_1 \right)}{w_2-w_1}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top