Sabine on Small Nuclear Reactors

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights skepticism about the viability of certain energy sources, particularly nuclear reactors adapted from naval technology. It points out that these naval reactors use highly enriched uranium, which raises concerns about potential misuse for weapons. The conversation questions the credibility of those advocating for this adaptation, suggesting they lack understanding of the differences between power and naval reactor technologies. Financial media is identified as a source of this argument, indicating a disconnect between military and civilian energy applications. The overall sentiment is that the enthusiasm for these energy solutions is diminishing, with significant challenges remaining.
BWV
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
1,925

The hype seems to be evaporating - unfortunately it does not appear these will be a viable energy source anytime soon

She does not mention the common argument that one can just adapt the reactors used in naval vessels. However these reactors use highly enriched U ~20% that could in the wrong hands be used to make weapons. Cost is also not a factor for military vessels.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Just who is making this "common argument"?

I'm guessing people who understand neither power reactor nor naval reactor technology.
 
Another <splat!> Here's a video.

If the video isn't worth the time to summarize, why is it worth the time to watch?
 

Thread 'MCNP6 BURN Card Issue: Zero Burnup for Material in Fuel Assembly'

Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information（power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.） for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
View full post »

Thread 'Beginner Seeking Help: MCNP6 Burnup Example (OECD-NEA Benchmark)'

Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
View full post »

Similar threads

Computation for nuclear reactor systems
Replies
1
Views
3K
MCNP and simple nuclear physics
Replies
9
Views
3K
Atomic displacements, replacements, and radiation damage of structural materials
Replies
1
Views
637
Transatomic - Molten Salt Reactor (from Question about LFTR?)
Replies
12
Views
4K
Why can’t decay heat be harnessed to safely shutdown a nuclear reactor?
Replies
14
Views
10K
Neutron Capture in Hydrogen Fusion Reactor
Replies
18
Views
4K
Nuclear power plants, perfect military targets
Replies
3
Views
5K
Is Nuclear Power More Efficient Than Coal in Energy Production?
Replies
10
Views
13K
The Economics of Nuclear Energy
Replies
19
Views
7K
Is nuclear energy a viable solution for our energy problems?
Replies
2
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top