Sahara - Amazon rainforest connection

  • Thread starter Thread starter jety89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the connection between the Sahara Desert and the Amazon rainforest, specifically regarding the potential nutrient exchange through atmospheric processes. Participants explore the implications of this relationship for the longevity and health of the Amazon rainforest, questioning the historical context of both regions and the sources of nutrients available to the rainforest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assertion that the Sahara is only 6000 years old and how this timeline aligns with the Amazon rainforest's existence over millions of years.
  • There is speculation about other potential sources of minerals for the Amazon rainforest, including contributions from the Andes via river systems.
  • A participant mentions a study indicating the importance of the Bodélé depression as a phosphate source, but notes that definitive answers are still lacking.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that the Amazon rainforest may function as a closed system, relying primarily on sunlight and water, with limited external nutrient input.
  • Concerns are raised about the general impoverishment of rainforest soil, except in areas where human activity has enhanced soil fertility.
  • Participants reference the phenomenon of Saharan dust being transported to other regions, including the UK, as a potential example of nutrient transfer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nutrient dynamics between the Sahara and the Amazon, with no consensus reached on the extent or significance of this connection. Some argue for the importance of external nutrient sources, while others maintain that the rainforest may be self-sufficient.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the historical timelines of the Sahara and the Amazon, as well as the complexity of nutrient sources and soil fertility in the rainforest. There are references to studies and articles, but no definitive conclusions are drawn.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying ecology, climate science, or the interconnections between different biomes, as well as individuals curious about the environmental dynamics of the Sahara and Amazon regions.

jety89
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am being told in "PBS NOVA 2013 Earth from space" that the Amason rainforest is being fed continously with phosphites from the Sahara desert where an ancient lakebed releases diatomites into the atmosphere.
All good and well - you might think. But wait! The same program, as well as other sources claim the Sahara desert to be 6000 years old only. So how did the rainforest in South America survived for millions of years, or otherwise -- just how strong Is the dependence of the vegetation in the Amasonas basin on the Sahara nutrients?
Are there any studies of this, or has this question never been asked before?
Why is this connection being quoted so many times? Is it that important of a discovery?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I guess we could trace sources like this and this confirming the narration.

To my knowledge that question has not popped up anywhere. Also , looking at the totally different paleoclimate situation compared to today, I could imagine that there may be/have been other sources for the mineral requirements for the Amazon rain forest.
 
Thanks for the sources

The article in the IOPScience journal suggests that

*the makers are also interested in these questions:
"Answers to these questions are needed to understand the nature of the emissions in the past, and the future capability of the Bodélé to fertilize the Amazon."

*they list all, or most of the relevant sources available.

*they are dedicated to answering these questions.

*But there is no anser yet to them.

Therefore, I think it is satisfactory to evaluate our current state of knowledge on the question about the importance of the Bodélé depression as a phosphate source to the amazon.
Still, it would be interesting to know, if there are other "hidden", or less interesting sources of phosfate available to the rainforest. I would imagine that those sorts of minerals could come from the Andes, transported using the river system. The Amason rainforest seems to have existed for millions and millions of years, without ever becoming a "wet desert". In fact, I don't really know of any good example of a wet desert in existence today. Any suggestions?
 
There appears to be a school of thought that the Amazon rainforest is a closed system, not requiring any input other than sun and water. The soil is generally impoverished except in certain localities where people built villages and towns and recycled body waste to build up a black soil for crops. Although rainforests are sometimes known as the lungs of the planet they do not seem to have any useful oxygen surplus.

Storms in the Sahara sometimes dump loads of sand in the UK, most of it on my car;-) 100s of thousands of tons at a time, apparently.
 
It's customary to make statements like that supported by evidence. There have been instances like the Younger Dryas that things were a bit different. But that's to keep science awake and non-complacent.
 
Sorry, I should have put in some references. In common with many readers of these forums, I have a limited access to real scientific papers. But everyone should be able to get to these...The fertility of the Amazon rainforest soil is dealt with indirectly in this Wikipedia page. Useful references are at the bottom of the page:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta

On the "lungs of the planet" we have...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Rainforest_are_sometimes_called_the_lung_of_the_earth_what_does_it_mean

...and...

http://www.agairupdate.com/article_detail.php?_kp_serial=00000571

And finally, on UK sand from Sahara...
http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/dust-storm-brings-saharan-sand-to-the-uk/
(If you look at the dust on your car after these events under a microscope you can see classic wind-born sand - sand in a low energy environment tends to be silicate with rounded grains, unlike the high-energy environment of the sea)

Hope this is useful
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very mouch so, thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K