Same RF signal to both gates of MOSFET --> Better linearity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the same RF signal to both gates of a dual-gate MOSFET, specifically a follower stage, to achieve better linearity. The presenter notes that this technique, combined with optimal DC biasing, can enhance performance by flattening the transfer characteristic curve. However, concerns are raised about potential harmonic mixing and intermodulation products due to the dual-gate configuration. The characteristics of the dual-gate MOSFET, when configured as a triode, lead to a square law response, which can be advantageous for certain applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dual-gate MOSFETs and their configurations
  • Knowledge of RF signal processing and mixing techniques
  • Familiarity with DC biasing methods for MOSFETs
  • Basic principles of harmonic distortion and intermodulation in electronic circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research optimal DC biasing techniques for dual-gate MOSFETs
  • Explore the effects of load resistance on MOSFET characteristics
  • Learn about harmonic distortion and intermodulation in RF circuits
  • Investigate the Miller effect and its implications in MOSFET design
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and designers working with RF circuits, particularly those focused on improving linearity in MOSFET applications, as well as anyone involved in the design and optimization of mixing stages in communication systems.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
780
From 03:39 the presenter describes a dual-gate MOSFET follower stage. He states that he gets better linearity by applying the same RF input to both gates (with different DC biasing of course).



Considering that many MOSFET mixer circuits have RF and LO applied separately to the two gates, won't the RF mix with itself in the described circuit, resulting in higher harmonic levels?

If the trick is in optimal biasing, are there any sources that discuss this technique?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The single gate MOSFET is a three electrode device, or triode, whereas the dual gate MOSFET is a four electrode device, or tetrode. When the two gates are strapped together, we turn the tetrode into a triode. The former has a transfer characteristic which is S-shaped, so we see flattening of the peaks, and above a certain threshold we observe odd-order harmonics and intermodulation. On the other hand, the triode has a square law characteristic, so for large signals we see even-order distortion, giving rise to even harmonics. This effect is linearised to some extent by using a high value load resistance.

It is likely that generation of even order harmonics will be less troublesome than the generation of intermodulation products, which can lie near the wanted signal and be impossible to remove. A disadvantage of the triode is the higher capacitance between drain and gate, which is multiplied by the gain and appears across the input (the Miller effect). In the present application the device is driven by a small antenna element having a capacitance of a few picofarads, so the input capacitance needs to be somewhat smaller than this.

The two gates of a dual gate MOSFET each control the drain current, so the drain current is proportional to their product. As you mention, this a enables the device to work as a multiplicative mixer, where the signal V is applied to G1 and the local oscillator (LO) to G2. The instantaneous LO voltage then controls the gain applied to the signal, resulting in mixing action.

When G1 and G2 are strapped together, as in the present case, the drain current will depend on Vg1 x Vg2 = V^2, so we obtain a triode characteristic.

Although it is my understanding that, with a low resistance load, FETs exhibit a square law characteristic, for a vacuum triode I believe we see an exponent of 3/2.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Swamp Thing

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
39K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K