Scalar product of many-particle states?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the calculation of the scalar product of two non-orthogonal many-particle quantum states, specifically in the context of spin-1/2 particles. Participants explore the representation of these states in a Hilbert space and the implications of different notations and bases.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to find the scalar product of two non-orthogonal many-particle states, providing an example involving spin states.
  • Another participant agrees with the need to express the states as vectors in a 4-dimensional space and suggests a basis for the Hilbert space of two spin-1/2 particles.
  • A challenge is raised regarding the interpretation of the states, with a participant asserting that certain combinations of states are distinct from others.
  • A participant shares their realization of a previous misconception about entanglement and mentions developing a Python program to assist with calculations.
  • Clarification is provided about the notation used for tensor products and the potential ambiguity in the order of particles in the bra-ket notation.
  • One participant outlines the definition of the scalar product in terms of the tensor product of states, emphasizing the need for clarity in notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to express states in a vector space and the importance of notation. However, there are differing views on the interpretation of certain combinations of states and the implications of entanglement, indicating unresolved aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the notation and the specific definitions of states, which may affect the interpretation of the scalar product.

Gerenuk
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
5
How do you find the scalar product of two non-orthogonal many particle states?
For example [itex]<\leftarrow,\rightarrow|\uparrow,\downarrow>[/itex]
I wanted to express both as a 4-vector in the up/down basis, but this seems weird, since then a state [itex]|\uparrow\downarrow+\downarrow\uparrow>[/itex] is like [itex]|\uparrow\uparrow+\downarrow\downarrow>[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you said is correct. Express both as a vector in the 4-dimensional space of states.
A sensible basis for the hilbert space of two spin halfs is
uu,ud,du,dd
Your last sentence doesn't make sense though. (ud+du) is obviously different from (uu + dd)
(0,1,1,0) vs. (1,0,0,1);

Your first example is
<(u-d)(u+d)/2|ud>=(1/2)<uu-du-dd+ud|ud> = 1/2.
where I've used the fact that downx = (u-d)/root(2) and upx = (u+d)/root(2) for a single spin half.
 
Thanks for the answer. I used to do calculations right, but I wasn't aware that some other weird approach I tried was something incorrect. I had some misconception about entanglement in mind.
Today I wrote a python program that seems to get it right and so I can play around with it :)
 
[itex]|\uparrow,\downarrow\rangle[/itex] is a shorthand notation for the tensor product [itex]\left|\uparrow\rangle_1\otimes\left|\downarrow\rangle_2[/itex]. I'm actually not sure if the notation [itex]\langle\leftarrow,\rightarrow|[/itex] usually puts particle 1 first, or if the order is reversed in the bras. I'm guessing that the order is the same. (Check your book to make sure). If that's the case, you're looking for the scalar product of [itex]\left|\leftarrow\rangle_1\otimes\left|\rightarrow\rangle_2[/itex] and [itex]\left|\uparrow\rangle_1\otimes\left|\downarrow\rangle_2[/itex], which is defined as

[tex]_2\langle\rightarrow|\otimes\ _1\langle\leftarrow|\ (\left|\uparrow\rangle_1\otimes\left|\downarrow\rangle_2)={}_1\langle\leftarrow|\uparrow\rangle_1\ _2\langle\rightarrow|\downarrow\rangle_2[/itex][/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K