Schonberg-Chandrasekhar mass for low mass stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherrod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Stars
AI Thread Summary
In low mass stars (0.1 to 0.5 solar masses), the core accumulates helium ashes but does not reach the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit due to their fully convective nature, preventing shell burning. As a result, these stars can burn a significant fraction of their hydrogen before leaving the main sequence, but they will not ignite helium burning due to insufficient temperature. The density of the helium core just before reaching the limit is not well-defined, as these stars do not form low-mass white dwarfs, making predictions uncertain. Instead, they are expected to contract into helium white dwarfs after exhausting hydrogen. The discussion highlights the unique evolutionary path of low mass stars compared to more massive counterparts.
Sherrod
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I am dealing with the following issue: in low mass stars during the main sequence, the core gets filled with He ashes over time until the pressure is not sufficient to keep it in hydrostatic balance. Then the core starts to contract on KH timescale until it hits the full degeneracy where the contraction stops and the star becomes a WD.
My question is: what is the density of the He core just before it reaches the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit?
Is it the same as the initial H core density of ~200g/cm3? Or does it change as more He is added over time?
Thank you.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I am not sure that I understand the question.

What do you mean by "low mass star", because I am uncertain if there is a specific definition.

For masses smaller than the sun (and a bit larger), I do not believe the limit is ever reached.

For stars that are slightly larger than the sun, the limit is about 0.1 of the mass of the star.

You can find their original paper here:

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?letter=.&classic=YES&bibcode=1942ApJ...96..161S&page=&type=SCREEN_VIEW&data_type=PDF_HIGH&send=GET&filetype=.pdf

You should investigate later research papers and post what you have discovered.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Vociferous,
I did not find anything on this specific range of stars. Everything I found refers to the paper you posted which holds for stars a bit more massive than the Sun.
By low mass stars, I refer to stars with ~0.1 to 0.5 Sun. Since the pressure of the envelope above the core is smaller, they can burn more than 10% of their hydrogen before they leave the main sequence. But how much is this fraction of the start total mass? This is what I wanted to know.
 
Sherrod said:
Hi Vociferous,
I did not find anything on this specific range of stars. Everything I found refers to the paper you posted which holds for stars a bit more massive than the Sun.
By low mass stars, I refer to stars with ~0.1 to 0.5 Sun. Since the pressure of the envelope above the core is smaller, they can burn more than 10% of their hydrogen before they leave the main sequence. But how much is this fraction of the start total mass? This is what I wanted to know.

For very low-mass stars (like the kind you mention), they are fully convective, so shell burning is impossible, at least in theory (the universe is not old enough to test this). The helium from their core gets mixed into the envelope and the hydrogen from their envelope gets mixed into the core.

So basically, I think the answer to your question is that the limit is never reached and since there are no low-mass white dwarfs, we really cannot be certain how they will form or even if they will form. The "best guess" is that they form what is known as a helium white dwarf, something that is thought to exist today (although formed by other means).[1]

I don't believe these stars will ever truly leave the main sequence during their normal lifetime, because they will never ignite helium burning as they cannot get hot enough. Again though, they are so tiny that the Earth won't even be around when we see the first low-mass stars burn out.
[1]http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0404291v1.pdf
 
Well, they'll leave the main sequence when they run out of hydrogen, and contract into helium white dwarfs, but I presume you are not counting that in their "normal" lifetime. You are certainly right that these stars won't have shell burning and won't have a Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit, that's for stars with convective cores but radiative envelopes, more massive than about 2 solar masses. That limit is the cause of the "Hertsprung gap", a kind of forbidden zone in the H-R diagram where stars cannot have an ideal-gas helium core that can support itself against the weight of its own envelope, so the core is crushed until it goes degenerate, creating a red giant or red supergiant.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top