Schonberg-Chandrasekhar mass for low mass stars

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherrod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar mass limit in the context of low mass stars, specifically those with masses between 0.1 to 0.5 solar masses. Participants explore the implications of this limit on the evolution of low mass stars, particularly regarding their helium cores and the conditions under which they may transition to white dwarfs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the density of the helium core just before reaching the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit, asking if it remains the same as the initial hydrogen core density or changes as helium accumulates.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the definition of "low mass star" and suggests that the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit may not be reached for stars smaller than the Sun.
  • A participant clarifies that low mass stars can burn more than 10% of their hydrogen before leaving the main sequence, but questions how this relates to their total mass.
  • It is proposed that very low-mass stars are fully convective, which may prevent shell burning and complicate the formation of low-mass white dwarfs.
  • Some participants argue that low mass stars will eventually leave the main sequence when they exhaust their hydrogen, but they may not ignite helium burning due to insufficient temperatures.
  • There is a suggestion that the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit applies primarily to stars with convective cores and radiative envelopes, typically more massive than about 2 solar masses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the applicability of the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit to low mass stars, with multiple competing views on whether these stars will form white dwarfs and the conditions under which they evolve.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the definitions of low mass stars and the specific conditions under which the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit is relevant. The discussion also highlights the uncertainty surrounding the evolutionary paths of very low-mass stars.

Sherrod
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I am dealing with the following issue: in low mass stars during the main sequence, the core gets filled with He ashes over time until the pressure is not sufficient to keep it in hydrostatic balance. Then the core starts to contract on KH timescale until it hits the full degeneracy where the contraction stops and the star becomes a WD.
My question is: what is the density of the He core just before it reaches the Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit?
Is it the same as the initial H core density of ~200g/cm3? Or does it change as more He is added over time?
Thank you.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I am not sure that I understand the question.

What do you mean by "low mass star", because I am uncertain if there is a specific definition.

For masses smaller than the sun (and a bit larger), I do not believe the limit is ever reached.

For stars that are slightly larger than the sun, the limit is about 0.1 of the mass of the star.

You can find their original paper here:

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?letter=.&classic=YES&bibcode=1942ApJ...96..161S&page=&type=SCREEN_VIEW&data_type=PDF_HIGH&send=GET&filetype=.pdf

You should investigate later research papers and post what you have discovered.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Vociferous,
I did not find anything on this specific range of stars. Everything I found refers to the paper you posted which holds for stars a bit more massive than the Sun.
By low mass stars, I refer to stars with ~0.1 to 0.5 Sun. Since the pressure of the envelope above the core is smaller, they can burn more than 10% of their hydrogen before they leave the main sequence. But how much is this fraction of the start total mass? This is what I wanted to know.
 
Sherrod said:
Hi Vociferous,
I did not find anything on this specific range of stars. Everything I found refers to the paper you posted which holds for stars a bit more massive than the Sun.
By low mass stars, I refer to stars with ~0.1 to 0.5 Sun. Since the pressure of the envelope above the core is smaller, they can burn more than 10% of their hydrogen before they leave the main sequence. But how much is this fraction of the start total mass? This is what I wanted to know.

For very low-mass stars (like the kind you mention), they are fully convective, so shell burning is impossible, at least in theory (the universe is not old enough to test this). The helium from their core gets mixed into the envelope and the hydrogen from their envelope gets mixed into the core.

So basically, I think the answer to your question is that the limit is never reached and since there are no low-mass white dwarfs, we really cannot be certain how they will form or even if they will form. The "best guess" is that they form what is known as a helium white dwarf, something that is thought to exist today (although formed by other means).[1]

I don't believe these stars will ever truly leave the main sequence during their normal lifetime, because they will never ignite helium burning as they cannot get hot enough. Again though, they are so tiny that the Earth won't even be around when we see the first low-mass stars burn out.
[1]http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0404291v1.pdf
 
Well, they'll leave the main sequence when they run out of hydrogen, and contract into helium white dwarfs, but I presume you are not counting that in their "normal" lifetime. You are certainly right that these stars won't have shell burning and won't have a Schonberg-Chandrasekhar limit, that's for stars with convective cores but radiative envelopes, more massive than about 2 solar masses. That limit is the cause of the "Hertsprung gap", a kind of forbidden zone in the H-R diagram where stars cannot have an ideal-gas helium core that can support itself against the weight of its own envelope, so the core is crushed until it goes degenerate, creating a red giant or red supergiant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
21K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K