Schrödinger equation for particle on a ring in a magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Schrödinger equation for a particle (electron) on a ring in a magnetic field is derived using the covariant derivative to ensure gauge invariance. The equation incorporates both the potential energy due to the magnetic field and the spin of the particle. The final form of the equation is: i ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ = (1/2m) [-Δψ - i∇·(Aψ) - iA·∇ψ - q²A²ψ] + qΦψ, where the Hamiltonian includes terms for the magnetic vector potential and the spin interaction, leading to the Pauli equation. The gauge potential is defined as A = -1/2 x × B for a homogeneous magnetic field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with gauge invariance and covariant derivatives
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic potentials, specifically vector and scalar potentials
  • Basic concepts of quantum spin and the Pauli equation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Pauli equation in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about gauge invariance in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the implications of magnetic fields on quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of spin in quantum mechanics and its mathematical representation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers in theoretical physics focusing on quantum systems in electromagnetic fields.

Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
hi

i need the schrödinger equation for a particle(electron) in a ring under the influence of a magnetic field that goes through perpendicular to the plane of the ring and i want to consider the spin too.

Well, the particle in the ring is pretty easy:

[itex]- \frac{ \hbar^2}{2mr^2} \psi''(\phi)=E \psi (\phi)[/itex]

but what is about the magnetic field?

i thought that if i take

[itex]E_{pot}=\mu B=\frac{e m v r}{2m}B=\frac{e l B}{2m}[/itex]

and therefore:
[itex]- \frac{ \hbar^2}{2mr^2} \psi''(\phi)+\frac{i \hbar e}{2m} \psi '(\phi) B=E \psi (\phi)[/itex]

and then i would get an additional term if i want to consider the spin:


[itex]E_{pot}=\mu B=\frac{-g_s \mu_B \sigma }{\hbar }B[/itex]
and therefore:
[itex]- \frac{ \hbar^2}{2mr^2} \psi''(\phi)+\frac{i \hbar e}{2m} \psi '(\phi) B+\frac{-g_s \mu_B \sigma }{\hbar }B\psi(\phi)=E \psi (\phi)[/itex]

so, is this the right equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not completely correct.

The important point of electromagnetic fields is that it is a gauge field, and thus to get a gauge invariant equation, you have to introduce the covariant derivative

[tex]D_{\mu}=\partial_{\mu}+\mathrm{i} q A_{\mu},[/tex]

where [itex]A_{\mu}[/itex] is the four potential of the electromagnetic field. In the following non-relativistic limit I write [itex]A_0=\Phi[/itex] for the scalar potential and [itex]\vec{A}[/itex] for the vector potential.

For non-relativistic without spin you start with the Schroedinger equation for a free particle

[tex]\mathrm{i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=-\frac{1}{2m} \Delta \psi.[/tex]

To couple the electromagnetic field to it, you just substitute all derivatives by their gauge-covariant derivatives, i.e.,

[tex]\partial_t \rightarrow D_0=\partial_t+\mathrm{i} q \Phi.[/tex]

For the gradient one has

[tex]D_i = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^i} + \mathrm{i} q A_i = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^i} - \mathrm{i} q A^i,[/tex]

i.e. the correct substitution for the nabla operator in 3D-vector analysis notation reads

[tex]\vec{\nabla} \rightarrow \vec{D}=\vec{\nabla}-\mathrm{i} q A^i.[/tex]

Plugging this into the Schrödinger equation, one gets

[tex]\mathrm{i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}-q \Phi \psi=\frac{1}{2m} (-\mathrm{i} \vec{\nabla}-q \vec{A})^2 \psi[/tex]

or to extract the Hamiltonian

[tex]\mathrm{i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\hat{H} \psi=\frac{1}{2m} [-\Delta \psi - \mathrm{i} \vec{\nabla} \cdot (\vec{A} \psi) - \mathrm{i} \vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \psi - q^2 \vec{A}^2 \psi]+ q \Phi \psi.[/tex]

For a homogeneous magnetic field you set

[tex]\vec{A}=-\frac{1}{2} \vec{x} \times \vec{B}.[/tex]

To consider spin you indeed only need to add

[tex]\hat{H}_{\text{Spin}}=-\frac{q}{2m} g_S \hat{\vec{S}} \cdot \vec{B}.[/tex]

This leads to the Pauli equation.

For the problem of a particle restricted to a circle, just substitute the gradient and Laplacean in spherical coordinates and set [itex]\partial/\partial r=\partial/\partial \vartheta=0[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K