I Schrodinger Equation from Ritz Variational Method

Samama Fahim
Messages
52
Reaction score
4
ritz variationalk principle.JPG

(This is from W. Greiner Quantum Mechanics, p. 293 from the topic of Ritz Variational Method)

1) Are ##\frac{\delta}{\delta \psi^{*}}## derivatives in equations 11.35a and 11.35b? If this is so, we can differentiate under the integral sign to get ##\int d^3x (\hat{H}\psi)## in equation 11.35a and ##\int d^3x \psi## in 11.35b, but why would ##\int d^3x (\hat{H}\psi)## be equal to just ##\hat{H}\psi## and ##\int d^3x \psi## to just ##\psi##?

2) Moreover, we replace ##\delta \bra{\psi}\hat{H}\ket{\psi}## in 11.34 with ##\hat{H}\psi## and ##\delta \bra{\psi}\ket{\psi}## with ##\psi## resulting in the equation at the bottom. Why is that? Is it that ##\delta (\psi^{*}\hat{H}\psi) = \hat{H}\psi \delta \psi^{*}## because we are looking at variation in ##\psi^{*}## and so we can take ##\hat{H} \psi## out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Those are functional derivatives, not regular derivatives.

2) The functional derivative wrt ##\psi^*## does not vary ##\psi## or ##H##.
 
  • Like
Likes protonsarecool, Samama Fahim and vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top