Schwarzschild Metric & Satellite Orbits: A Question

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Schwarzschild metric and the proper time in the context of a circular orbit of an unpowered spaceship around a massive body. The user is confused about the equivalence of two equations representing the metric, particularly how the proper time relates to the Schwarzschild metric when the radius is fixed at R. It is clarified that the equations are consistent up to a sign, depending on the metric signature, and that the proper time is used for timelike intervals. Additionally, it is noted that stable orbits require the radius to be greater than 6m. Understanding these nuances in notation and the conditions for stability is crucial for resolving the user's confusion.
TrueBlue1990
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Thanks in advance - this problem has been bothering me for a while!

I'm working with an unpowered spaceship orbiting a large mass M. The orbit is circular and it is following the geodesic freely. It has an orbit radies of r = R.

My question is this. The metric of the space-time curvature is the Schwarzschild metric:

ds^2 = - (1 - 2GM/(r*c^2) )*(c^2)dt^2 + [(1 - 2GM/(r*c^2) )^-1]*dr^2 + (r^2)dθ^2 + (r^2)*(sinθ^2)d∅^2 -(1)

But I keep seeing references to ds^2 = - (c^2)*d(tau)^2 -(2)

I understand the angular terms and dr disappear as the d(tau) means we are observing the orbit from the reference frame stationary with the satellite. But I can only how equation (1) = equation (2) in a Schwarzschild curved space if r (distance between mass and satellite) tends to infinity. But, in the case of the satellite's reference frame r=R.

I will be eternally grateful to anyone that can shed light on my error of understanding. Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would like to answer but I have no idea what you mean. The circular orbit has

\frac{dt}{d\tau}=\frac{\sqrt{r}}{\sqrt{r-3\,m}},\ \ \frac{d\phi}{d\tau}=\frac{\sqrt{m}}{r\,\sqrt{r-3\,m}} in case that helps.

Remember that the proper-length s in the metric is also cτ, so ds2= c22

[Edit]As Bill_K points out below this is true up to a sign, depending on the metric signature.
 
Last edited:
Also r > 6m for orbits to be stable.
 
But I keep seeing references to ds^2 = - (c^2)*d(tau)^2
This is just a matter of notation. ds2 is called the spacetime interval. It's positive for a spacelike distance and negative for a timelike one. For a timelike interval it's more convenient to use in place of ds2 the proper time. So you pull out a minus sign, and pull out a factor of c2 to give it the right dimensions. Otherwise ds2 and dτ2 are interchangeable.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
636
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K