Charles_Xu
- 5
- 0
Why does the Schwarzschild metric have a singularity at r=0 if it is only valid outside the spherically symmetric static mass?
The discussion revolves around the nature of the singularity at r=0 in the Schwarzschild metric, particularly questioning why this singularity exists when the metric is said to be valid only outside a spherically symmetric static mass. The scope includes theoretical considerations of general relativity and the properties of the Schwarzschild solution.
Participants express differing views on the nature of the singularity at r=0, with no consensus reached regarding its implications in the context of the Schwarzschild metric and its applicability to real physical scenarios.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions about the nature of the manifold and the conditions under which the Schwarzschild solution is applied, particularly concerning the presence of mass and the definition of the vacuum region.
If we are talking about the vacuum region outside a spherically symmetric static mass, that region does not include ##r = 0##, and it does not include a singularity.Charles_Xu said:Why does the Schwarzschild metric have a singularity at r=0 if it is only valid outside the spherically symmetric static mass?
The Schwarzschild solution to the EFE is vacuum everywhere - no mass anywhere, stress-energy tensor is zero everywhere, the ##M## that appears in the metric is a parameter that characterizes the solution not the mass of anything. Thus any point with ##r\gt 0## is an element of the manifold and it makes sense to consider the singularity at ##r=0##.Charles_Xu said:Why does the Schwarzschild metric have a singularity at r=0 if it is only valid outside the spherically symmetric static mass?
This is true but properly stating it was more work than I wanted to do.Dale said:Just to be slightly pedantic: the Schwarzschild manifold does not include r=0.