I Schwarzschild Metric Singularity: Why?

Charles_Xu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Why does the Schwarzschild metric have a singularity at r=0 if it is only valid outside the spherically symmetric static mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charles_Xu said:
Why does the Schwarzschild metric have a singularity at r=0 if it is only valid outside the spherically symmetric static mass?
If we are talking about the vacuum region outside a spherically symmetric static mass, that region does not include ##r = 0##, and it does not include a singularity.

The singularity at ##r = 0## is only present in a black hole spacetime, where the vacuum Schwarzschild region is not outside a static mass; if a mass (i.e., a region occupied not by vacuum but by matter) is present in the spacetime, it is not static but is a collapsing region (as in the Oppenheimer-Snyder 1939 model of gravitational collapse), and the vacuum region outside it goes all the way down to ##r = 0##.
 
Charles_Xu said:
Why does the Schwarzschild metric have a singularity at r=0 if it is only valid outside the spherically symmetric static mass?
The Schwarzschild solution to the EFE is vacuum everywhere - no mass anywhere, stress-energy tensor is zero everywhere, the ##M## that appears in the metric is a parameter that characterizes the solution not the mass of anything. Thus any point with ##r\gt 0## is an element of the manifold and it makes sense to consider the singularity at ##r=0##.

When we apply the Schwarzschild solution to the vacuum outside of a real object of mass ##M## and non-zero radius we’re considering just a subset of the entire manifold, a subset that doesn’t include the singularity.
 
Just to be slightly pedantic: the Schwarzschild manifold does not include r=0.
 
Dale said:
Just to be slightly pedantic: the Schwarzschild manifold does not include r=0.
This is true but properly stating it was more work than I wanted to do.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top