High School Science behind Einstein vs. Bohr Debate?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the contrasting views of Einstein and Bohr regarding quantum mechanics, specifically the role of observation in determining reality. Bohr posited that reality is contingent upon observation, while Einstein argued for an independent universe unaffected by consciousness. The concept of a "conscious" observer has been largely dismissed in modern physics; observation simply refers to the detection of quantum states. Current interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as those informed by Bell's theorem and the PBR theorem, suggest that both perspectives are interpretations of the same underlying physics. Ultimately, the debate highlights the complexities and philosophical implications of quantum theory rather than definitive scientific conclusions.
ChrisisC
Messages
54
Reaction score
4
On a episode of "PBS Spacetime" (fantastic youtube series, go check it out), the host mentioned that Bohr believed that reality doesn't exist until a quantum system is observed. Einstein believed that the universe still runs independently outside of a conscious observers mind. What is the actual science behind both of these accusations if there is any? I hope this isn't too philosophical for the forum. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ChrisisC said:
On a episode of "PBS Spacetime" (fantastic youtube series, go check it out), the host mentioned that Bohr believed that reality doesn't exist until a conscious observer actually measures the quantum system. Einstein believed that the universe still runs independently outside of a conscious observers mind. What is the actual science behind both of these accusations if there is any? I hope this isn't too philosophical for the forum. Thanks!
The concept of a "conscious" observer being needed was dropped about 100 years ago.
 
phinds said:
The concept of a "conscious" observer being needed was dropped about 100 years ago.

I thought a quantum system chose which quantum state it was in once observed? Like in the quantum eraser experiment? can you clarify how a conscious observer is not needed in a case like that?
 
ChrisisC said:
I thought a quantum system chose which quantum state it was in once observed? Like in the quantum eraser experiment? can you clarify how a conscious observer is not needed in a case like that?
A conscious observer is NEVER required. "Observation" does not mean "by a conscious observer" it just means detection of some characteristic.
 
phinds said:
A conscious observer is NEVER required. "Observation" does not mean "by a conscious observer" it just means detection of some characteristic.

Changed the post to satisfy the information you gave to me, thanks!
 
ChrisisC said:
What is the actual science behind both of these accusations if there is any?

The actual science is the same either way. These are just two different interpretations of the same physics. Neither one has much currency nowadays, since, as phinds mentioned, the idea that consciousness is required for an "observer" has long since been dropped.
 
ChrisisC said:
On a episode of "PBS Spacetime" (fantastic youtube series, go check it out), the host mentioned that Bohr believed that reality doesn't exist until a quantum system is observed. Einstein believed that the universe still runs independently outside of a conscious observers mind. What is the actual science behind both of these accusations if there is any? I hope this isn't too philosophical for the forum. Thanks!
The man who first transformed it into a proper science was John Bell:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_theorem

Another more recent breakthrough was the PBR theorem:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBR_theorem
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
11K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
21K