Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the formatting requirements for submitting papers to the journal Science, specifically addressing the confusion regarding whether to use a single column or three column format. Participants explore the submission guidelines, typesetting processes, and the expectations for authors in preparing their manuscripts.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants note that the journal has typesetters who format the manuscript according to their standards, implying that authors should focus on adhering to submission guidelines rather than formatting.
- There is confusion among participants about whether the manuscript should be submitted in a single column or three column format, with multiple requests for clarification on this point.
- One participant suggests that if the template provides a single column format, that should be submitted, as the typesetters will handle the final formatting.
- Another participant mentions that Science is more involved in the formatting process compared to other journals, indicating that authors may not need to worry about the final typesetting.
- Concerns are raised about the difficulty of reviewing articles in three column format, with some suggesting that single column formats are more practical for reviewers.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express uncertainty regarding the correct format for submission, with no consensus reached on whether to use a single column or three column format. The discussion reflects differing views on the responsibilities of authors versus typesetters in the formatting process.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the distinction between formatting style and typesetting, noting that the author’s role is primarily to prepare the manuscript for review rather than to finalize its appearance in the journal.