SE Class 12 Maths Alternating Series Test

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Alternating Series Test states that if the sequence $\{a_n\}$ is positive, strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n = 0$, then the series $\sum (-1)^n a_n$ converges. The discussion explores whether the condition of "strictly decreasing" can be omitted. A counterexample using the series with terms \(a_n = 1/n\) for odd \(n\) and \(2/n\) for even \(n\) demonstrates that the series diverges despite the terms approaching zero. The conclusion is that the condition can be relaxed to "non-increasing" without affecting convergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of convergence tests in series, specifically the Alternating Series Test.
  • Familiarity with sequences and limits, particularly $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = 0$.
  • Knowledge of positive and decreasing sequences in mathematical analysis.
  • Ability to construct and analyze counterexamples in series convergence.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of relaxing conditions in convergence tests, focusing on the Alternating Series Test.
  • Explore the concept of non-increasing sequences and their role in series convergence.
  • Investigate other convergence tests, such as the Ratio Test and Root Test, for broader understanding.
  • Examine additional counterexamples to the Alternating Series Test to solidify comprehension of its conditions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in series convergence, particularly those studying calculus or real analysis.

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.

Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.

Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.

Consider the series with terms \(a_n=1/n\) for \(n\) odd and \(2/n\) for \(n\) even.

Now \(\{a_n\}\) is a sequence of positive terms and \( \lim_{n \to \infty}a_n=0 \) but \( \sum (-1)^n a_n\) diverges since the \(k\)-th partial sum is the \(k\)-th partial sum of the alternating harmonic series and the half the \(\lfloor k/2 \rfloor \)-th partial sum of the harmonic series. Hence the sequence of partial sums diverges since the sequence of partial sum of the alternating harmonic series converges and that of the harmonic series diverges.

CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
Consider the series with terms \(a_n=-1/n\) for \(n\) odd and \(2/n\) for \(n\) even.

That's not a valid counterexample since $\{a_n\}$ should be positive.
 
Alexmahone said:
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.

Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.

Hmm.

$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}+1}+...$$Edit:


Another one:

Take, $ a_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{n}-(-1)^n}$, with $n>1$.
 
Last edited:
Alexmahone said:
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.
Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.
Let $b_n = \left\lfloor {\dfrac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right\rfloor $ or $1,1,2,2,3,3,\cdots$

Now let $a_n=\dfrac{1}{b_n}$. Does $\sum\limits_n {( - 1)^n a_n } $ converge?
 
Plato said:
Let $b_n = \left\lfloor {\dfrac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right\rfloor $ or $1,1,2,2,3,3,\cdots$

Now let $a_n=\dfrac{1}{b_n}$. Does $\sum\limits_n {( - 1)^n a_n } $ converge?

Surely $\displaystyle\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots$ converges to 0.
 
Alexmahone said:
Surely $\displaystyle\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots$ converges to 0.

Think again.
 
Also sprach Zarathustra said:
Think again.

Let $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ be the sequence of partial sums.

$\displaystyle s_{2k-1}=\frac{1}{k}$ and $\displaystyle s_{2k}=0$

Since both the subsequences $\displaystyle\{s_{2k-1}\}$ and $\displaystyle\{s_{2k}\}$ converge to 0, $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ converges to 0.
 
Alexmahone said:
Let $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ be the sequence of partial sums.
$\displaystyle s_{2k-1}=\frac{1}{k}$ and $\displaystyle s_{2k}=0$
Since both the subsequences $\displaystyle\{s_{2k-1}\}$ and $\displaystyle\{s_{2k}\}$ converge to 0, $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ converges to 0.
That is correct. But can you play with a similar sequence?
 
  • #10
Plato said:
That is correct. But can you play with a similar sequence?

$\displaystyle 1-\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4^2}+\ldots+\frac{1}{2n-1}-\frac{1}{(2n)^2}+\ldots$ diverges as the sum of the positive terms diverges.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Alexmahone said:
$\displaystyle 1-\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4^2}+\ldots+\frac{1}{2n-1}-\frac{1}{(2n)^2}+\ldots$ diverges as the sum of the positive terms diverges.
Actually the proof of the alternating test only requires that $a_n\ge a_{n+1}$. So yes you can make that change.
I should have read the OP more closely.
 
  • #12
Flogging a dead horse...$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}+1}+...$$

$$S_{2n}=\sum_{k=2}^{n+1}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}+1})=\sum_{k=2}^{n+1}\frac{2}{k-1}$$

In other words, $S_{2n}$ equals to the first n terms of diverges series $\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{2}{k-1}$, hence $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}S_{2n}=\infty $$
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Also sprach Zarathustra said:
[h=1]Flogging a dead horse...[/h]
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}+1}+...$$


But $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}<\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}$ so it is not decreasing.
 
  • #14
Plato said:
But $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}<\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}$ so it is not decreasing.

That's the point of the counterexample.
 
  • #15
Alexmahone said:
That's the point of the counterexample.
Your OP asks if decreasing could be replaced with non-increasings.
That is, can $a_n>a_{n+1}$ can be replaced by $a_n\ge a_{n+1}$?
The answer is yes it can.
The proof of the alternating series test allows that.
I said that I failed to read the OP closely the first time.
Sorry for the confusion.
 
  • #16
Plato said:
Your OP asks if decreasing could be replaced with non-increasings.
That is, can $a_n>a_{n+1}$ can be replaced by $a_n\ge a_{n+1}$?
The answer is yes it can.
The proof of the alternating series test allows that.
I said that I failed to read the OP closely the first time.
Sorry for the confusion.

My OP asks if "strictly decreasing" can be omitted, not if "strictly" can be omitted.
 
  • #17
Alexmahone said:
My OP asks if "strictly decreasing" can be omitted, not if "strictly" can be omitted.
That is exactly what I just said.
If you omit "strictly" from "strictly decreasing" the correct term is "non-increasing".
And the answer is YES it can be omitted with changing the proof.
 
  • #18
Plato said:
If you omit "strictly" from "strictly decreasing" the correct term is "non-increasing".

Agreed. But the question wants us to omit "strictly decreasing", not just "strictly".

Please read carefully what I actually wrote.
 
  • #19
Alexmahone said:
Agreed. But the question wants us to omit "strictly decreasing", not just "strictly". Please read carefully what I actually wrote.
I give up!
 
  • #20
Alexmahone said:
That's not a valid counterexample since $\{a_n\}$ should be positive.

Sorry take the signs off, I was writing the terms of the series with the sign alternation.

CB
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K