SE Class 12 Maths Alternating Series Test

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of the alternating series test, specifically whether the condition of the sequence being "strictly decreasing" can be omitted while still ensuring convergence of the series. Participants explore various examples and counterexamples related to this topic, engaging in both theoretical and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the alternating series test requires the sequence to be positive and strictly decreasing, while others question the necessity of the "strictly decreasing" condition.
  • One participant provides a counterexample using the series with terms \(a_n=1/n\) for \(n\) odd and \(2/n\) for \(n\) even, arguing that it diverges despite meeting the limit condition.
  • Another participant challenges the validity of a proposed counterexample that uses negative terms, stating that the terms must be positive.
  • Several participants discuss sequences involving floor functions and their convergence properties, with some suggesting that the series converges to 0.
  • There is a mention of a series that diverges as the sum of its positive terms diverges, raising questions about the conditions under which the alternating series test holds.
  • Participants clarify that the proof of the alternating series test allows for non-increasing sequences, suggesting that omitting "strictly" does not invalidate the test.
  • Confusion arises regarding the interpretation of the original question about omitting "strictly decreasing," with participants reiterating the need for careful reading of the problem statement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the "strictly decreasing" condition can be omitted, with some arguing it can be replaced by "non-increasing" while others maintain that the original condition is necessary for convergence. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the proof of the alternating series test may allow for non-increasing sequences, but the implications of this on convergence are still debated. There are also references to specific sequences and their convergence properties that may depend on the definitions used.

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.

Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.

Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.

Consider the series with terms \(a_n=1/n\) for \(n\) odd and \(2/n\) for \(n\) even.

Now \(\{a_n\}\) is a sequence of positive terms and \( \lim_{n \to \infty}a_n=0 \) but \( \sum (-1)^n a_n\) diverges since the \(k\)-th partial sum is the \(k\)-th partial sum of the alternating harmonic series and the half the \(\lfloor k/2 \rfloor \)-th partial sum of the harmonic series. Hence the sequence of partial sums diverges since the sequence of partial sum of the alternating harmonic series converges and that of the harmonic series diverges.

CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
Consider the series with terms \(a_n=-1/n\) for \(n\) odd and \(2/n\) for \(n\) even.

That's not a valid counterexample since $\{a_n\}$ should be positive.
 
Alexmahone said:
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.

Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.

Hmm.

$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}+1}+...$$Edit:


Another one:

Take, $ a_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{n}-(-1)^n}$, with $n>1$.
 
Last edited:
Alexmahone said:
Alternating series test: If $\{a_n\}$ is positive and strictly decreasing, and $\lim a_n=0$, then $\sum(-1)^n a_n$ converges.
Is the alternating series test still valid if "strictly decreasing" is omitted? Give a proof or counterexample.
Let $b_n = \left\lfloor {\dfrac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right\rfloor $ or $1,1,2,2,3,3,\cdots$

Now let $a_n=\dfrac{1}{b_n}$. Does $\sum\limits_n {( - 1)^n a_n } $ converge?
 
Plato said:
Let $b_n = \left\lfloor {\dfrac{{n + 1}}{2}} \right\rfloor $ or $1,1,2,2,3,3,\cdots$

Now let $a_n=\dfrac{1}{b_n}$. Does $\sum\limits_n {( - 1)^n a_n } $ converge?

Surely $\displaystyle\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots$ converges to 0.
 
Alexmahone said:
Surely $\displaystyle\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots$ converges to 0.

Think again.
 
Also sprach Zarathustra said:
Think again.

Let $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ be the sequence of partial sums.

$\displaystyle s_{2k-1}=\frac{1}{k}$ and $\displaystyle s_{2k}=0$

Since both the subsequences $\displaystyle\{s_{2k-1}\}$ and $\displaystyle\{s_{2k}\}$ converge to 0, $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ converges to 0.
 
Alexmahone said:
Let $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ be the sequence of partial sums.
$\displaystyle s_{2k-1}=\frac{1}{k}$ and $\displaystyle s_{2k}=0$
Since both the subsequences $\displaystyle\{s_{2k-1}\}$ and $\displaystyle\{s_{2k}\}$ converge to 0, $\displaystyle\{s_n\}$ converges to 0.
That is correct. But can you play with a similar sequence?
 
  • #10
Plato said:
That is correct. But can you play with a similar sequence?

$\displaystyle 1-\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4^2}+\ldots+\frac{1}{2n-1}-\frac{1}{(2n)^2}+\ldots$ diverges as the sum of the positive terms diverges.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Alexmahone said:
$\displaystyle 1-\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4^2}+\ldots+\frac{1}{2n-1}-\frac{1}{(2n)^2}+\ldots$ diverges as the sum of the positive terms diverges.
Actually the proof of the alternating test only requires that $a_n\ge a_{n+1}$. So yes you can make that change.
I should have read the OP more closely.
 
  • #12
Flogging a dead horse...$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}+1}+...$$

$$S_{2n}=\sum_{k=2}^{n+1}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}+1})=\sum_{k=2}^{n+1}\frac{2}{k-1}$$

In other words, $S_{2n}$ equals to the first n terms of diverges series $\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{2}{k-1}$, hence $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}S_{2n}=\infty $$
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Also sprach Zarathustra said:
[h=1]Flogging a dead horse...[/h]
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}+1}+...$$


But $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}<\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}$ so it is not decreasing.
 
  • #14
Plato said:
But $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}<\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}-1}$ so it is not decreasing.

That's the point of the counterexample.
 
  • #15
Alexmahone said:
That's the point of the counterexample.
Your OP asks if decreasing could be replaced with non-increasings.
That is, can $a_n>a_{n+1}$ can be replaced by $a_n\ge a_{n+1}$?
The answer is yes it can.
The proof of the alternating series test allows that.
I said that I failed to read the OP closely the first time.
Sorry for the confusion.
 
  • #16
Plato said:
Your OP asks if decreasing could be replaced with non-increasings.
That is, can $a_n>a_{n+1}$ can be replaced by $a_n\ge a_{n+1}$?
The answer is yes it can.
The proof of the alternating series test allows that.
I said that I failed to read the OP closely the first time.
Sorry for the confusion.

My OP asks if "strictly decreasing" can be omitted, not if "strictly" can be omitted.
 
  • #17
Alexmahone said:
My OP asks if "strictly decreasing" can be omitted, not if "strictly" can be omitted.
That is exactly what I just said.
If you omit "strictly" from "strictly decreasing" the correct term is "non-increasing".
And the answer is YES it can be omitted with changing the proof.
 
  • #18
Plato said:
If you omit "strictly" from "strictly decreasing" the correct term is "non-increasing".

Agreed. But the question wants us to omit "strictly decreasing", not just "strictly".

Please read carefully what I actually wrote.
 
  • #19
Alexmahone said:
Agreed. But the question wants us to omit "strictly decreasing", not just "strictly". Please read carefully what I actually wrote.
I give up!
 
  • #20
Alexmahone said:
That's not a valid counterexample since $\{a_n\}$ should be positive.

Sorry take the signs off, I was writing the terms of the series with the sign alternation.

CB
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K